other admiralty liens, may be lost by un- reasonable delay in asserting it, if the rights of purchasers or incumbrancers have inter- vened; 9 Wheat. 409; 16 Bost. L. Rep. 264; 17 id. 93, and authorities there cited; 2 W. & M. 48; 1 Swab. 269; 1 Cliff. 308; 5 Rob. Adm. 94. The lien extends to the fund re- coverable for the ship's tortious destruc- tion; 59 Fed. Rep. 621. The rules under which courts of admiralty marshal assets claimed to be applicable to the payment of bottomry and other maritime liens and of common-law and statutory liens, will be more properly and fully considered in the article Maritime Liens, which see. But it is proper here to state that, as between the holders of two bottomry bonds upon the same vessel in respect to different voyages, the later one, as a general rule, is entitled to priority of payment out of the proceeds of the vessel; 1 Dod. 2013; Olc. 55; 17 Bost. L. Rep. 93; 1 Paine 671. Seamen have a lien, prior to that of the holder of the bottomry bond, for their wages for the voyage upon which the bot- tomry is founded, or any subsequent voy- age; but the owners are also personally liable for such wages, and if the bottomry- bond holder is compelled to discharge the seamen's lien, he has a resulting right to compensation over against the owners, and has been held to have a lien upon the pro- ceeds of the ship for his reimbursement; 8 Pet. 538; 1 Abb. Adm. 150; 1 Hagg. Adm. 62. And see 1 Swab. 261; 1 Dod. 40; 4 Cranch 328. Under the laws of the United States, bot- tomry bonds are only quasi negotiable, and except in cases subject to the principle of equitable estoppel, the indorsee takes only the payee's right; 37 Fed. Rep. 436. The act of congress of July 29, 1850, de- claring bills of sale, mortgages, hypotheca- tions, and conveyances of vessels invalid against persons other than the grantor or mortgagor, his heirs and devisees, not hav- ing actual notice thereof, unless recorded in the office of the collector of the customs where such vessel is registered or enrolled, expressly provided that the lien by bot- tomry on any vessel, created during her voyage by a loan of money or materials necessary to repair or enable such vessel to prosecute a voyage, shall not lose its prior- ity or be in any way affected by the pro- visions of that act. See Pars. Mar. Law; Abbott, Shipping, with Story and Perkins's notes; Hall's translation of Emerigon's Essay on Maritime Loans, with the Appen- dix; Tyler, Usury (pt. iii. Mar. Loans); Marsh. Ins. book 2; 3 Kent 49; 8 Pet. 538; 1 Hagg. Adm. 179; 2 Pet. Adm. 295; 54 Fed. Rep. 188. See NAUTICA PECUNIA.