BILLS OF CREDIT

Definition

Bills of credit are paper instruments issued by a state government on the sole credit and faith of that state, designed to circulate among the public as a medium of exchange — functioning, in practical effect, as money. They are not backed by specie held in reserve but by a government pledge to redeem them at a future date. The term carries two intertwined meanings in American law: 1. Constitutional prohibition sense: The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10, bars states from emitting bills of credit. In this context, bills of credit are state-issued paper notes intended to pass as currency, distinguishable from legitimate state borrowing instruments (such as bonds or notes payable to a named holder) by their intended circulation as a general medium of exchange rather than as conventional debt instruments payable to specific parties. 2. Broader commercial sense (historical): Before the constitutional prohibition took hold as a practical matter, the term encompassed any paper note issued on government or institutional credit — including colonial-era currency issued by individual colonies and, in some usage, instruments issued by authorized public banks. The constitutional definition is the operative one for legal research. Whether a particular instrument qualifies as a bill of credit — and is therefore prohibited to states — turns primarily on two features: (a) it is issued by a state, and (b) it is intended to circulate as money. Instruments that merely evidence a state's debt to a specific creditor, or that require a named party to demand payment, generally fall outside the prohibition. ---

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Plural of bill of credit — no independent common-language definition offered; the phrase has no established meaning outside legal and financial contexts. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not applicable; the phrase remained substantially a legal and governmental term without a divergent popular meaning. Editorial note: Because bills of credit have no active modern counterpart in everyday commerce — paper currency is now issued exclusively by the federal government — the term is effectively legal and historical vocabulary. Researchers encountering the phrase in non-legal historical texts (newspapers, pamphlets, colonial records) will find it used descriptively for government paper money, consistent with the legal definition, but without the constitutional weight the phrase carries in case law. ---

Common Confusion

Bills of credit are frequently confused with two related instruments: Bills of exchange: A bill of exchange is a private commercial instrument ordering one party to pay a sum to another. It does not circulate as general currency and is not issued on state credit. The confusion arises because both instruments are called "bills" and both involve deferred payment obligations. State bonds and notes: States may constitutionally borrow money and issue debt instruments. The distinction from a prohibited bill of credit lies in purpose and design: a bond or note payable to a named holder, not intended to pass hand-to-hand as currency, is lawful state debt. The constitutional prohibition captures instruments designed to substitute for money in general circulation. Courts have drawn this line repeatedly, and the distinction is often fact-specific. ---

Why It Matters in Research

This term's primary modern research value is constitutional, not commercial. The Article I, Section 10 prohibition has generated a distinct body of Supreme Court doctrine interpreting what counts as an emission of bills of credit, and that case law is the essential foundation for any research in this area. Researchers should be aware of several navigational points: Historical sources use the term expansively. Colonial and early republic sources — legislative records, pamphlets, debates at the Constitutional Convention — use "bills of credit" to describe a wide range of government paper. Not all of that usage maps onto the constitutional prohibition, which was a reaction to specific abuses of the colonial and Confederation periods. Reading historical sources without that context can distort what the prohibition was targeting. The Rehnquist-era and early republic case law is the interpretive anchor. The leading cases interpreting the constitutional prohibition date primarily to the nineteenth century. Researchers working in the Law Mind corpus will find the term appearing heavily in materials from roughly 1790–1870; after that period, federal monopoly over currency largely rendered the state-level question moot in practice, though the doctrinal framework remained. State banking history creates ambiguity. Many antebellum states chartered banks and authorized them to issue notes. Whether those bank notes constituted state-emitted bills of credit — or were purely private instruments — was a contested legal and political question of the period. The answer depended heavily on how much state control existed over the bank. Researchers should not assume that nineteenth-century "bank notes" and "bills of credit" are synonyms, but neither should they assume they are wholly distinct. Confederation-era documents require extra care. Under the Articles of Confederation, the prohibition that later appeared in the Constitution did not exist for states. Bills of credit issued in that period were legally uncontroversial as a matter of constitutional structure, and documents from that era will use the term in a neutral, descriptive register. ---

Historical Dictionary Support

Burrill's Law Dictionary offers the clearest and most authoritative historical definition available in the Law Mind corpus. Burrill tracks the Supreme Court's own language closely, defining bills of credit as promissory notes or bills issued exclusively on the credit of the state, intended to circulate as money, redeemable at a future day, with state faith pledged for payment. The citation to 4 Peters' Reports and Kent's Commentaries roots the definition firmly in early republic doctrine. What Burrill's definition does well: It captures all three functional elements — state issuance, circulation purpose, and faith-of-the-state backing — that courts used to identify a prohibited instrument. It correctly distinguishes these instruments from ordinary state debt by emphasizing intended circulation through the community "for its ordinary purposes as money." What Burrill's definition does not address: It does not grapple with the edge cases that generated the most litigation — particularly state-chartered bank notes and instruments that had some but not all of the prohibited features. Researchers relying solely on Burrill for constitutional research will need to supplement with the primary case law, as the dictionary captures the core definition without mapping the doctrinal perimeter. Kent's Commentaries (cited by Burrill) remain an important secondary source for the political and historical backdrop of the prohibition, connecting it to the fiscal chaos of the Confederation period. ---

Jurisdictional Note

The prohibition on bills of credit applies to states under the U.S. Constitution; the federal government is not subject to Article I, Section 10 and historically issued its own paper currency (including Civil War-era greenbacks, the constitutionality of which raised separate legal questions under the Legal Tender Cases). Territorial governments and the District of Columbia occupy different constitutional positions and require separate analysis. ---

Related Terms