BEAUMANOIR - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

BEAUMANOIRAuthored

The Law Mind • 893 words

Definition

Philippe de Rémi, Sire de Beaumanoir (c. 1247–1296) was a French jurist and royal official whose principal legal work, the Coutumes de Beauvaisis (also rendered Coustumes de Beauvoisis), stands as one of the most significant surviving accounts of customary law in medieval France. In legal research, "Beaumanoir" functions as a shorthand reference to that treatise rather than to the man himself — much as "Bracton" refers both to a jurist and to the De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae attributed to him.

The Coutumes de Beauvaisis, composed around 1283, systematically describes the law and judicial practice of the Beauvaisis region of northern France as Beaumanoir observed and administered it in his capacity as bailli (royal administrative judge). It is not a theoretical text but a practical record: how courts actually functioned, how procedure was conducted, how customary rules were applied and resolved when they conflicted. As such, it occupies for French customary law roughly the same scholarly position that Bracton occupies for English common law of the same era — a learned practitioner's attempt to give rational, organized form to living legal custom.

Why It Matters in Research

Researchers encountering "Beaumanoir" in legal historical texts should understand that the name operates on three levels simultaneously: the historical person, the treatise, and a symbol of the broader French customary law tradition. Context will usually clarify which is meant, but conflation is common in older secondary literature.

The primary research trap is chronological imprecision. Burrill's entry flags a genuine scholarly dispute — whether Beaumanoir was a contemporary of Pierre de Fontaines (Defontaines), who wrote in the reign of Louis IX (St. Louis, r. 1226–1270), or whether he followed him. Montesquieu's placement of Beaumanoir after Defontaines is now the more widely accepted view in modern scholarship. Researchers using nineteenth-century legal dictionaries or comparative law treatises should check which chronology their source assumes, as arguments about the development of French customary law sometimes hinge on this sequence.

Beaumanoir is frequently cited alongside Bracton in comparative common law and civil law scholarship, particularly in discussions of how custom was "rationalized" or "systematized" in the thirteenth century. These comparisons can be illuminating but carry a risk: the Coutumes de Beauvaisis describes regional custom, not French national law. It reflects the practice of one province and one bailli. Treating it as equivalent in scope to Bracton's treatise — which aspired to describe the law of England as a whole — overstates what Beaumanoir was attempting to do.

The Coutumes de Beauvaisis is also a primary source for the study of medieval French procedure, feudal tenure, and the role of the bailli as a royal judicial officer. Researchers working on comparative legal history, the development of European court procedure, or the relationship between royal and customary authority in Capetian France will find it foundational. The treatise has been edited in modern critical editions and portions translated, but most legal dictionary references point to the original French text, which requires paleographic and linguistic preparation to use directly.

Historical Dictionary Support

Burrill's Law Dictionary provides the essential identification: Beaumanoir as a "celebrated French law writer, nearly or quite contemporary with the English Bracton," whose work describes "the law and practice of the French courts as it existed in his time." This framing is characteristic of nineteenth-century Anglo-American legal scholarship, which approached Beaumanoir primarily through the Bracton comparison — a useful orienting device, but one that can flatten the differences in purpose, scope, and audience between the two works.

Burrill faithfully records the chronological uncertainty between Dr. Robertson's placement of Beaumanoir as a contemporary of Defontaines and Montesquieu's contrary view. This is not a trivial dispute: the sequence of Defontaines, Beaumanoir, and other customary law writers bears on how historians reconstruct the trajectory of French legal rationalization in the thirteenth century. Burrill does not resolve the question, which is appropriate — it remained contested in his time.

What historical legal dictionaries generally omit is any account of Beaumanoir's practical role. He was not merely a writer but an active royal official who administered justice in several provinces. The Coutumes de Beauvaisis is, among other things, a manual for doing what he did. This practical dimension is largely invisible in dictionary treatments, which tend to situate him in a lineage of "law writers" rather than as a working jurist whose treatise emerged from administrative experience.

Jurisdictional Note

Beaumanoir's work describes the customary law of the Beauvaisis region of northern France under Capetian royal authority. It has no direct force in any modern jurisdiction but remains an authoritative source for historians of French law, comparative legal history, and the development of Western legal institutions in the medieval period.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

See Law Mind Encyclopedia — Medieval Legal Literature; Customary Law; Bailli; Bracton

BEAUMANOIRmain

Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867

A celebrated French law writer, nearly or quite contemporary with the English Bracton, whose work, entitled Coustumes de Beauvoisis, contains an account of the law and practice of the French courts as it existed in his time. Dr. Robertson makes him a contemporary of Defontaines, who wrote in the reign of St. Louis, but Montesquieu places him after that writer, (whom he calls the oldest law writer in France,) and says he wrote a little after St. Louis' death, which happened A. D. 1270. 1 Rob. Charles V. Appendix, note xxv. Esprit des Lois, liv. 28, c. 38. According to Mr. Barrington, he kept the courts of the Comte de Clermont, and his treatise gives an account of the customary laws of Beauvoisis (a district about forty miles to the northward of Paris) as they prevailed in the year 1283. The same writer observes that this treatise is so complete, and throws so much light upon the ancient common law of England, that it cannot be too much recommended to the perusal of the English antiquary, historian or lawyer. Obs. Stat. 494, note [c]. It is, however, rarely referred to by English writers. Marvin's Leg. Bibliog. BEAUPLEADER, Beaupleder, Bewpleader. [Fr. beauplaider, beu pleder; L. Lat. de pulchre placitando; from beau, pulcher, fair, and plaider, placitare, to plead.] In old practice. Fair pleading; apt or correct pleading; or, according to Mr. Reeves, the fair or favorable hearing of a plea, or suit. See infra. ** Fines were anciently imposed by courts in England, for beaupleader, (pro pulchre placitando,) or fair pleading. Fleta, lib. 2, c. 66, § 18. The statute of Marlebridge, 52 Hen. III. c. 11, (affirmed by statute Westm. 1, c. 8,) ordained that such fines should no longer be taken, and gave a writ directed to the sheriff, bailiff, or whoever would demand the fine, prohibiting him from demanding it. Id. ibid. §§ 19, 20. Cowell. 2 Reeves' Hist. Eng. Law, 70. See Britt. c. 20. The common explanation of these terms in the old books is not very satisfactory. It is said by Fitzherbert that the fine for beaupleader meant a fine for not pleading fairly, or aptly to the purpose. F. N. B. 270 a. This is also the view of Sir Matthew Hale. Hist. Com. Law, c. 7. Lord Coke considers it as a fine imposed for the privilege of pleading fairly, by way of amendment, after a former vicious plea; which seems a more natural explanation. 2 Inst. 122, 123. The author of the Termes de la Ley speaks of it as a fine taken of a party by a sheriff, or other bailiff, in his court, to the end that he shall not plead fairly, &c. Mr. Reeves thinks it did not signify a fine for amending a wrong plea, but a fine taken of suitors by bailiffs or judges of inferior courts, for a fair or perhaps favorable hearing of their cause, which fair hearing was called pulchre placitare, or beaupleader. 2 Reeves' Hist. Eng. Law, 70.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In