Definition
A barrettor (also spelled barrator) is a person who habitually engages in barratry — that is, one who persistently stirs up quarrels, litigation, or legal disputes, either among others or on their own behalf, without lawful justification. The offense is one of chronic, vexatious meddling in legal proceedings rather than any single act. At common law, a common barrettor was a recognized criminal type: a person whose pattern of provoking suits, brawls, or contentions made them a public nuisance.
The term is the actor noun corresponding to the offense of barratry (in its common-law criminal sense). A barrettor does not merely participate in litigation — they incite, foment, or manufacture it as a habitual course of conduct.
---
Common Confusion
BARRETTOR, BARRATOR, and BARRATER are variant spellings of the same term and should be treated as interchangeable in historical sources. The inconsistency in spelling across old authorities reflects the term's Latin and French roots filtering through centuries of English legal writing. Researchers should search all variant spellings when working in historical corpora.
More significantly, BARRETTOR must be distinguished from BARRATOR in the maritime and insurance sense. In admiralty and insurance law, barratry (spelled the same) refers to a distinct wrong: fraudulent or criminal conduct by a ship's master or crew against the shipowner. The actor in that context is sometimes also called a barrator, but the maritime meaning is entirely separate from the common-law criminal meaning addressed here. Context — land-based litigation versus maritime commerce — is the key to distinguishing which meaning applies.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Barrettor is an archaic term that has largely fallen out of active legal use, but researchers encounter it in several important contexts.
First, because the term is definitionally tied to barratry, sources treating one almost always illuminate the other. Rapalje & Lawrence's entry cross-references directly: "See BARRETRY." Any research into barrettor must run parallel searches under barratry and its variant spellings (barretry, barratry).
Second, spelling instability is a genuine research trap. Historical sources use barrator, barretor, barrettor, and barrater with no consistent standard. Full-text corpus searches that rely on a single spelling will miss material. Plan for variant searches across all forms.
Third, the common-law offense of being a common barrettor was a criminal charge in English and early American law, meaning it appears in criminal pleading treatises, indictment forms, and early American court reports as well as legal dictionaries. The 15 Am. Dec. 322 citation in Rapalje & Lawrence points to American Decisions — a compilation of selected state appellate opinions — indicating the term had active doctrinal life in early American courts, not merely theoretical existence as an English import.
Fourth, researchers should be alert to the fact that the offense of common barratry (and with it, the figure of the barrettor) was gradually absorbed, displaced, or effectively superseded by modern rules governing frivolous litigation, abuse of process, champerty, and maintenance. In contemporary legal writing, you will rarely find the term used as an operative legal category; its appearance in modern sources is almost always historical or comparative.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence treat BARRETTOR by cross-reference to BARRETRY rather than with an independent substantive entry, which itself signals something about the term's structure: it is understood as derivative of the offense, not a freestanding concept. Their entry does, however, confirm the term's standing as a recognized common-law category and points to 15 Am. Dec. 322 as authority for the "common barrettor" definition — evidence of the term's early American judicial reception.
The entry also appears in close proximity to BARRA and BARRISTER, reflecting the visual and etymological proximity of these terms in the legal lexicon. Researchers skimming historical dictionaries should not conflate these: barra is a plea in bar; barrister is an advocate; barrettor is an offender. The proximity in alphabetical listings has occasionally generated loose cross-referencing in older sources that is more organizational than substantive.
Historical dictionaries generally agree on the core definition — habitual stirring of suits and quarrels — but vary in how much emphasis they place on the public nuisance dimension versus the individual harm dimension. Some older authorities stress that the barrettor's conduct injured specific parties; others emphasize the broader social harm of polluting the administration of justice. Both framings are historically legitimate.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The common-law offense of being a common barrettor was recognized in both English and early American jurisdictions, but its continuing vitality varied significantly by state. Some American jurisdictions codified barratry as a statutory offense; others let the common-law offense lapse without replacement. Researchers working in a specific jurisdiction should verify whether the offense had statutory footing or remained purely common law, as this affects where relevant authority will appear.
---