Definition
In law, "available" carries several distinct senses depending on context, each describing whether a legal tool, remedy, defense, argument, or resource is capable of being validly used or accessed in a given situation.
1. LEGALLY OPERATIVE OR VALID. A defense, plea, or objection is "available" when it is legally cognizable and may be interposed in a proceeding. An available defense is one that the law recognizes and that the party may properly raise—distinguished from a defense that has been waived, barred, or that does not exist under the applicable legal rule.
2. ACCESSIBLE AS A REMEDY OR OPTION. A remedy, cause of action, or legal mechanism is "available" when the conditions for its use are satisfied and nothing legally bars its exercise. Courts frequently ask whether a remedy is "available" to a party before turning to an alternative—for instance, whether an adequate remedy at law is available before equity will act, or whether administrative remedies are available before a court will accept jurisdiction.
3. READILY CONVERTIBLE TO MONEY (commercial and financial contexts). In mercantile and financial law, "available" describes assets or funds that can be promptly converted to cash. Available means are assets representing value easily reduced to money—liquid or near-liquid instruments recognized in commerce as money equivalents.
4. ADMISSIBLE OR EFFECTIVE FOR A PURPOSE. More generally, a fact, argument, or instrument is available when it is in a condition to be used effectively—not defective, not excluded, and not lost through procedural default.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Capable of being used for a purpose; readily obtainable; free to meet or speak with someone.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Having sufficient power, force, or efficacy to achieve the object; effectual; valid. Webster flagged the sense of "an available plea" as already becoming obsolete in 1913.
Editorial note: The common meaning of "available" is broadly functional—something is available if it can be accessed or obtained. The legal meaning is more conditional: availability depends not only on physical or practical accessibility but on legal entitlement and the absence of legal bars. A remedy may exist in theory but still not be "available" to a particular party in particular circumstances. The distance between "can be found" and "may lawfully be used" is precisely where legal research turns.
---
Common Confusion
"Available" is sometimes used loosely as a synonym for "applicable" or "adequate." These are distinct concepts. A remedy may be legally available (the right conditions exist, no bar applies) yet inadequate for purposes of triggering equitable relief—inadequacy is a separate question from availability. Similarly, a defense may be available in the abstract but rendered unavailable to a particular party by waiver, estoppel, or procedural default. Researchers should not assume that recognition of a legal option in one case settles its availability in another.
---
Why It Matters in Research
"Available" is a high-frequency threshold word in legal analysis, and its meaning shifts significantly by context. Understanding which sense is operative is critical before treating any legal conclusion as transferable.
**Remedies research.** Whether a remedy is "available" is often the first question courts address, and the answer controls whether the analysis proceeds at all. In equity, the availability of an adequate legal remedy forecloses equitable relief—so "available" here does real analytical work, not mere description. Researchers should track how courts define adequacy alongside availability; the two concepts are intertwined in specific performance and injunction doctrine.
**Exhaustion and access to courts.** Statutes governing prisoner litigation, administrative review, and habeas corpus frequently turn on whether a remedy was "available" in a technical sense. Courts have developed doctrine around what counts as genuinely available—procedures that are technically on the books but practically inaccessible may be treated as unavailable. This is a heavily litigated area and the historical dictionaries do not address it.
**Commercial and financial instruments.** The "available means" sense (assets readily convertible to money) appears in older mercantile contracts and commercial paper cases. Researchers working with pre-twentieth-century commercial records will encounter this usage. Modern securities and banking law uses "available" in specialized ways (available balance, available credit) that diverge from the historical mercantile meaning.
**Procedural default and waiver.** A defense or objection that was available but not raised may be treated as forfeited. The word "available" in procedural contexts therefore signals a judgment about what the party could have done—not what they did. This distinction drives much of the law on procedural default in appellate and post-conviction review.
**Trap for historical research.** Webster's 1913 flagged the sense of "available" as meaning "effectual" or "valid" as already obsolete. Bouvier uses it freely in both that sense and the mercantile sense. A researcher encountering "available" in a nineteenth-century text should not assume the modern procedural meaning applies—the word may simply mean "legally valid" or "effectual."
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's entry is compact but covers the two core legal senses well: (1) capable of being used, valid or advantageous—applied to defenses and pleas—and (2) readily convertible into money, as applied to commercial assets and securities. Bouvier cites Anderson for the commercial sense and cross-references a New York case for "available means."
Webster's 1913 adds useful historical texture. It explicitly notes that the sense of "available" meaning "effectual" or "valid" (as in "an available plea") was already archaic by 1913, citing Hooker for the older usage. This is a meaningful data point: legal writing continued to use "available" in this sense well after common usage had shifted, which creates a reading hazard in late nineteenth and early twentieth century legal texts.
Neither Bouvier nor Webster addresses the procedural and jurisdictional dimensions that dominate modern usage—the exhaustion doctrine, procedural default, and the specific performance adequacy test. These are developments of the twentieth century that post-date the historical dictionaries entirely.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia: Remedies — Specific Performance (Availability and Requirements)
Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia: Remedies — Punitive Damages in Contract (When Available)
Remedies & Equity Encyclopedia: Prejudgment Interest — Availability, Rate, and Discretionary vs. Mandatory Award
---