Definition
AVAIL has two distinct legal senses:
1. Efficacy or force sufficient to achieve a legal end. A plea, defense, instrument, or argument is said to "avail" when it is legally effective — when it has the force or operation necessary to accomplish its intended purpose. A plea that does not avail is one that fails as a matter of law, regardless of its factual content.
2. Proceeds, profits, or benefit derived from property or a transaction. Most commonly encountered in property and trust law, where "avails" (plural) refers to the net proceeds or income yielded by an asset — rents, sale proceeds, or the fruits of property held for another's benefit.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Effect in achieving a goal or aim; use or purpose (often in negative constructions, as in "to no avail"); also proceeds or profits from business transactions; benefit or advantage toward success.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): To turn to the advantage of; to be of service to; to profit; to benefit; to help. Also reflexively: to avail oneself of — to make use of or take advantage of.
The common language and legal language overlap substantially here, but the legal meaning carries a specific technical edge: in the pleading and evidence sense, "avail" functions as a term of art for legal sufficiency or operative force, not merely informal helpfulness. Whether a defense or instrument "avails" is a legal conclusion, not a practical observation. The proceeds sense ("avails of property") is also more precise and narrower than the casual use of "profit" or "benefit."
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
AVAILS OF PROPERTY: The net proceeds, rents, or income generated by property — a formulation appearing frequently in trust instruments, estate documents, and conveyances where a beneficiary is entitled to the economic output of property held by another.
AVAIL OF CREDIT: In financing and commercial law contexts, the drawing down or use of an available credit line; the act of making use of a credit facility.
TO NO AVAIL: A phrase appearing in pleadings and judicial opinions to indicate that a legal argument or procedural attempt lacked operative effect — it produced no legal result.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter AVAIL in three distinct situations, each requiring different interpretive attention.
First, in older pleading materials and case law, "avails" as a test of legal sufficiency is the operative question behind much procedural analysis — whether a plea, defense, or objection "avails" determines whether a party survives a demurrer or motion to dismiss. The word signals a legal-efficacy inquiry, not a factual one. Researchers reading 19th-century opinions must recognize this usage or they will misread holdings.
Second, in property and estate documents — particularly trust instruments, wills, and conveyances from the 18th through early 20th centuries — "avails" in the plural means proceeds or income. A bequest of "the avails of the farm" is not a bequest of the farm itself but of its economic output. Confusing this with a fee interest produces a fundamental misreading of the instrument.
Third, the Anderson's entry for this term is partially corrupted in the source material — the definition of AVAIL bleeds into fragments about authority (limited, unlimited, naked), which belong to separate entries on AUTHORITY. Researchers using Anderson's should be aware that the physical layout of older legal dictionaries sometimes causes adjacent entries to run together in digitized or transcribed form. The definition of AVAIL as it applies to legal efficacy is clean; the authority material is extraneous.
Jurisdictional variation in how "avails" is treated in specific statutory contexts (such as criminal statutes referencing the "avails of prostitution") is significant and warrants attention in criminal law research. The phrase has a specific statutory meaning in many state codes that differs from the general property-law usage.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Anderson's Dictionary of Law defines AVAIL as "[t]o be of use or advantage; to answer the purpose; to have strength, force, or efficacy sufficient to the end" — capturing the legal-sufficiency sense clearly. The formulation "efficacy sufficient to the end" is precise: it frames avail as a functional test, asking whether a legal instrument or argument accomplishes what it was designed to accomplish.
Anderson's does not address the "avails of property" sense directly, which reflects a gap in the source rather than an absence of the usage. The proceeds sense is well-attested in historical equity and property materials but tends to appear in treatises on trusts and estates rather than in general law dictionaries. Webster's 1913 captures it implicitly under the proceeds sense, and the Wiktionary entry lists it explicitly.
Neither historical dictionary source engages with the criminal law usage ("avails of prostitution"), which is a 20th-century statutory development. Researchers working in criminal law will need to consult statutory sources and case law directly for that meaning.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The "avails of prostitution" construction appears in criminal statutes across many U.S. states and in Canadian law, carrying specific definitions that courts have interpreted narrowly or broadly depending on jurisdiction. This usage is entirely distinct from the civil and property-law senses and should not be read interchangeably with them. Researchers working in criminal law contexts should verify the controlling statutory definition rather than relying on general dictionary meanings.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia: Remedies — Specific Performance (Availability and Requirements) [contracts_89]; Remedies — Punitive Damages in Contract (When Available) [contracts_94]
The Law Mind Remedies & Equity Encyclopedia: Prejudgment Interest — Availability, Rate, and Discretionary vs. Mandatory Award [remedies_66]
---