Definition
Arrestum (also spelled Arestum) is a Latin legal term carrying two distinct meanings in historical sources:
1. In old English law: Arrest; the act or state of being held under legal restraint. Used in formulaic Latin pleading and writ language, as in sub arresto detinuit — "he detained under arrest."
2. In old European (continental) law: The sentence or decree of a superior tribunal. In this sense, arrestum described a formal judicial pronouncement with binding authority, functionally closer to what modern law would call a judgment or decree than to the act of physical detention.
---
Common Confusion
The two meanings of arrestum pull in opposite directions and should not be conflated. The English usage tracks closely to the modern concept of arrest — seizure and detention of a person by legal authority. The continental European usage has no modern English cognate and instead describes a judicial output (a ruling or decree), not a physical act. A researcher encountering arrestum in a medieval source must determine whether the document originates in an English or continental tradition before interpreting the term. Importing the English meaning into a continental context, or vice versa, produces fundamental misreading.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Arrestum appears almost exclusively in Law Latin sources: original writs, pleading registers, and continental legal compilations. Researchers working in the Reg. Orig. (Registrum Omnium Brevium) tradition will encounter it in the English detention sense, embedded in formulaic writ language. The phrase sub arresto detinuit is a stock formula, not a term requiring deep analysis in that context — but it confirms that the writ or pleading concerns a detention-based cause of action.
The continental meaning is the greater research trap. In French and broader European civil law traditions, arrêt (the vernacular descendant of arrestum) continued to mean a judicial decree of a superior court — particularly the parlements of France. Researchers working in comparative legal history, early modern European legal texts, or mixed-tradition sources (such as those touching Norman, Scots, or Channel Islands law) must be alert to this sense. An arrestum of a parlement is a ruling to be read and analyzed as precedent or decree, not as an account of someone being taken into custody.
The etymological dispute noted by Burrill — Calvin tracing the word to Greek ἄρραστον (incorrupt, inviolate) and Budaeus to Greek κόρος (pleasure) — is of philological rather than practical interest. Neither etymology controls interpretation; context and legal tradition do.
Because arrestum does not appear in modern legal usage under this spelling, it is encountered almost entirely in historical legal documents, legal antiquarianism, and comparative legal scholarship. It is a term of source identification, not of living doctrine.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary is the primary shelf source addressing arrestum, and it handles the dual-meaning structure competently. Burrill correctly separates the English and continental senses, cites Spelman for the English usage and Calvin's Lexicon (Calvini Lexicon Juridicum) for the continental meaning, and preserves the Registrum Omnium Brevium citation (Reg. Orig. 94) as documentary support for the writ formula sub arresto detinuit.
What Burrill does not develop — and what historical dictionaries generally leave underexplored — is the downstream significance of the continental meaning for understanding the French arrêt tradition and its influence on civil law jurisdictions. The connection between arrestum as a superior tribunal's decree and the arrêts of the French parlements is a live research thread for legal historians that the dictionary tradition treats as merely etymological.
No significant divergence exists among shelf sources on the core definitions, largely because few historical dictionaries other than Burrill address this term in English-language legal lexicography.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The English meaning (detention/arrest) operated within the common law writ system and is most relevant to English legal history before the systematic reform of pleading. The continental meaning (judicial decree) is primarily relevant to French, Norman, and broader civil law traditions. Scots law, influenced by both common law and civilian sources, occasionally used arrêt-derived terminology in its own court practice, making jurisdictional identification especially important for researchers working in that tradition.
---