Definition
In historical Scots law, apprising was a form of diligence — a legal process by which a creditor could attach a debtor's heritable property (land) and have it conveyed to the creditor in satisfaction of the debt. It functioned as the primary mechanism for enforcing money judgments against real property in early Scots law. The process was eventually superseded by adjudication, a reformed procedure that addressed many of the practical and equitable shortcomings of apprising.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Present participle and gerund of "apprise" — meaning the act of informing or notifying someone of something.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): To apprise meant to give notice to; to inform; to make aware.
The gap between the ordinary English word and the legal term is complete. In common usage, "apprising" is simply informing someone. In historical Scots law, apprising was a technical term of art describing a creditor's remedy against land — a process of attachment and forced conveyance, with no semantic connection to notification. A researcher encountering "apprising" in a Scottish legal record should not read it as a form of "apprise" (to inform) but as a distinct procedural term.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Apprising appears primarily in pre-nineteenth-century Scottish legal records, treatises, and pleadings. Researchers working in the Law Mind corpus should be alert to several navigational points.
First, the term is jurisdictionally narrow. It is a creature of historical Scots law and will not appear in English common law sources in this technical sense. Its presence in a document is itself a signal that the source is Scottish.
Second, apprising was formally abolished and replaced by adjudication, meaning that sources after the late seventeenth century are more likely to reference adjudication as the operative process. The exact transition is documented in Scots legal history, and Bell's Dictionary — cited by Burrill — is the standard reference point for this shift. Researchers should treat apprising and adjudication as sequential rather than concurrent remedies when dating sources.
Third, the spelling and form can vary in historical manuscripts. Apprising, apprysing, and related archaic spellings all refer to the same process. Full-text corpus searches should account for orthographic variation.
Fourth, the proximity in Burrill's entry to the "Right of Approach" in international law is an artifact of alphabetical arrangement, not conceptual connection. The two terms are entirely unrelated. Researchers should not conflate them.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary provides the essential definition, characterizing apprising as a "diligence or process for attaching a debtor's land and conveying it to the creditor, in payment of his debt," and notes its replacement by adjudication. Burrill's reference to Bell's Dictionary (Bell's Dictionary and Digest of the Law of Scotland) directs researchers to the authoritative Scots law source for fuller treatment.
The historical dictionaries are limited in their coverage of apprising because it was already an archaic term by the time most English-language legal dictionaries were compiled in the nineteenth century. Sources focused on English law largely ignore it. For substantive doctrine — including the conditions under which apprising could be effected, the debtor's right of redemption, and the procedural mechanics — Bell and the institutional writers of Scots law (Stair, Erskine, Bankton) are the essential primary sources, not the general legal dictionaries.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Apprising is exclusively a historical Scots law term. It has no equivalent in English common law, and the process it describes was internal to the Scottish legal system before and after the Acts of Union. Researchers working in English, Irish, or American legal sources will not encounter apprising as a technical term.
---