Definition
Appeals is the plural of appeal. In legal usage, the term carries two distinct applications:
1. Judicial appeals. The process by which a party dissatisfied with a lower tribunal's decision asks a higher court to review and correct that decision. An appeal is not a new trial; it is a review of the record already made. The appellate court examines whether legal error occurred below, and in most systems defers to the trial court's factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous or against the manifest weight of the evidence. The losing party (appellant) files a notice of appeal, designates the record, and submits briefs arguing the error. The opposing party (appellee or respondent) defends the lower court's ruling.
2. Administrative appeals. Within agency systems, appeals refers to the internal review process by which a party challenges an agency decision before a higher-level officer, board, or council within the same agency — before or instead of seeking judicial review. These include the IRS Office of Appeals, the Social Security Appeals Council, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and the AAO, among many others. Administrative appeals may be de novo (fresh review of facts and law) or on-the-record (limited to the existing file), depending on the agency.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Third-person singular simple present indicative form of the verb "appeal" — as in "she appeals the decision."
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Appeal as a noun: a call upon a higher authority for review or relief; as a verb: to remove a cause to a superior court for re-examination.
The gap between common and legal usage is narrow for the noun form but matters in context. In everyday language, "appeals" often means any plea or request for reconsideration — a letter to a landlord, a petition to a school board. In law, appeals is a term of art with procedural requirements, jurisdictional prerequisites, and defined standards of review. Using the common meaning when researching legal sources will return material ranging from the precise to the irrelevant.
---
Common Confusion
Appeals vs. motions for reconsideration. An appeal goes upward — to a higher court or reviewing body. A motion for reconsideration (or rehearing) asks the same tribunal that issued the decision to revisit it. These are different procedural vehicles with different deadlines and different standards. Filing one does not substitute for the other and may or may not toll the deadline for the other.
Administrative appeals vs. judicial appeals. Many researchers conflate the two or assume one is a step in the other. They are parallel systems. In some contexts (Social Security, immigration), exhausting administrative appeals is a prerequisite to federal court jurisdiction. In others, the paths are optional or independent. Corpus materials on "appeals" may be addressing either system entirely.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
As-of-right appeals. Appeals the higher court must hear because a statute or constitutional provision requires it.
Discretionary appeals (certiorari). Appeals the higher court may accept or refuse. The U.S. Supreme Court operates almost entirely on discretionary review.
Interlocutory appeals. Appeals of rulings issued before final judgment. Generally disfavored and available only in defined circumstances.
Cross-appeals. When both parties appeal the same judgment, each challenging different aspects of the outcome.
Administrative appeals. Internal agency review processes as described above. Often governed by agency-specific regulations rather than general appellate rules.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The single most important navigational point: "appeals" in historical legal sources frequently refers to something narrower or entirely different from modern appellate practice. Black's Law Dictionary, as reflected in the source material here, defines "Appeals" (capitalized, as a proper noun) as the court of last resort in Mississippi — a historical institutional name, not the general concept. Researchers using older editions of Black's must read context carefully; the same word may be a proper noun (a court's name), a term of procedural art, or ordinary usage.
Historical sources also used "appeal" in now-obsolete criminal law senses — a formal accusation by one private party against another, entirely distinct from modern appellate review. This meaning surfaces in English common law materials and early American sources and can confuse researchers who encounter it without warning.
For administrative law research, the Law Mind corpus covers three distinct appeals systems — IRS, immigration (AAO/BIA), and Social Security — each with its own jurisdictional rules, standards of review, and relationship to judicial review. These systems do not work the same way. Cross-referencing the encyclopedia entries listed above before diving into primary sources will prevent significant misdirection.
Jurisdictional variation in appellate structure is substantial. Some states have intermediate appellate courts sitting between trial courts and a supreme court; others route certain case types directly. Federal appellate structure (circuit courts of appeals) does not map cleanly onto state systems.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary entry for "Appeals" — as provided — defines it as "the court of last resort in the state of Mississippi." This is an institutional proper noun, not a conceptual definition. It reflects a historical naming convention in which some states designated their highest court the "Court of Appeals" rather than "Supreme Court." Mississippi's Court of Appeals today is actually an intermediate appellate court; the state's highest court is the Supreme Court of Mississippi. Historical researchers working with Mississippi materials should verify which court held supreme authority during the period under study.
This entry is an outlier. Most historical legal dictionaries treat "appeal" (singular) as the substantive conceptual term and define it as the transfer of a cause from an inferior to a superior tribunal for re-examination. The plural "appeals" as a dictionary headword was typically handled as a proper noun or cross-reference. Researchers should not treat the Black's entry here as representative of the general legal meaning.
What historical dictionaries uniformly miss is the administrative appeals context, which expanded dramatically through the twentieth century. No nineteenth-century legal dictionary will help a researcher navigate IRS appeals procedures or Social Security administrative review. For those systems, regulatory materials and agency guidance are the controlling sources.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Appellate court structure varies significantly by jurisdiction. In the federal system, appeals from district courts go to one of the thirteen circuit courts of appeals, with discretionary review available at the Supreme Court. State systems vary: some have no intermediate appellate tier; others have specialized appellate courts for certain subject matters. Administrative appeals within state agencies follow state administrative procedure acts, which differ materially from the federal APA.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
IRS Appeals Office Administrative Appeals — Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia (tax_126)
AAO Appeals — Administrative Appeals Office Jurisdiction and De Novo Review — Law Mind Immigration Law Encyclopedia (immigration_97)
Social Security Appeals — Reconsideration, ALJ Hearing, Appeals Council, and Judicial Review — Law Mind Administrative Law & Government Encyclopedia (admin_104)
---