Definition
An alloynour is a person who conceals, steals, or secretly carries off property belonging to another. The term describes a covert thief or purloiner — one who acts furtively rather than by open force.
The term is Law French in origin and appears exclusively in historical legal usage. It has no surviving presence in modern statutory or common law vocabulary.
---
Common Confusion
Alloynour should not be confused with terms describing open or forcible taking, such as robbery or rapine. The defining characteristic of the alloynour is concealment and secrecy — the act is done privately, distinguishing it from offenses involving open confrontation or force. It sits closer to the modern concept of larceny or embezzlement in spirit, though it maps imperfectly onto any single modern offense category.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is an archaism of narrow historical scope. Researchers will encounter it almost exclusively in two contexts: (1) medieval and early modern English legal texts written in or heavily influenced by Law French, and (2) legal dictionaries that preserved the term for completeness rather than active use.
The sole primary source cited by Black's — Britton, chapter 17 — is a late 13th-century English legal treatise written in Law French and attributed to the reign of Edward I. Britton is an abridgment of Bracton's legal principles rendered for practical judicial use. Researchers working in pre-modern English criminal law will find alloynour appearing in this narrow textual tradition. The term does not appear to have migrated into reported case law or later statutory drafting.
The practical research trap here is assuming the term carries precise doctrinal weight equivalent to a modern offense element. It does not. Alloynour functioned more as a descriptive label for a type of wrongdoer than as a formal charge category with enumerated elements. Searching for it in post-medieval sources is unlikely to be productive. Its value is contextual: it illuminates how early English law distinguished covert taking from open theft, a distinction that eventually shaped the formal boundaries between larceny, robbery, and related offenses.
Researchers building a conceptual genealogy of theft-related offenses in Anglo-American law may find this term useful as a waypoint, but it should not be treated as a term of art with carrying precedential authority.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary reproduce the definition in identical terms: "one who conceals, steals, or carries off a thing privately," with the sole citation to Britton, c. 17. The consistency across editions reflects that this entry was carried forward as a matter of historical completeness rather than updated through new authority.
Neither edition elaborates on the elements of the concept or distinguishes alloynour from related terms. The brevity of the entry in both sources confirms the term's purely archival status by the time Black's first compiled it. No divergence exists between the two dictionary treatments — the second edition reproduces the first without modification or expansion.
What the historical dictionaries do not address: the relationship of alloynour to contemporaneous Law French terms for related wrongs, any procedural context in which the label was applied, or how the concept was absorbed (or discarded) as English criminal law formalized in the later common law period.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Larceny — Historical Development; Law French in English Legal Sources.
---