AGENCY

6 definitions found across Law Mind sources

← Dictionary
See encyclopedia: Agency -- Definition, Creation, and Types of Agency Relationships →
AGENCYAuthored
The Law Mind • 1930 words • Verified
Definition
Agency is a legal relationship in which one person (the agent) is authorized to act on behalf of another (the principal), with the effect that acts performed by the agent within the scope of that authority bind the principal as if the principal had acted directly. The relationship may be created by express agreement, implied conduct, or operation of law. Agency encompasses two overlapping concepts that researchers should distinguish: 1. Agency as a relationship: The legal status that arises when one party delegates authority to another to transact business, manage affairs, or affect legal rights on the delegating party's behalf. This is the dominant legal meaning. The principal is bound by the agent's authorized acts; third parties dealing with the agent may acquire rights against and obligations toward the principal directly. 2. Agency as a governmental body: In administrative and public law, an agency is a governmental entity — bureau, commission, board, or department — created by statute and delegated executive or quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial powers. This meaning is structurally separate from private-law agency and follows its own doctrinal rules. The private-law relationship has three essential features: the agent acts for the principal's benefit, the principal has the right to control the agent's conduct, and the agent consents to act in that capacity. Authority may be actual (express or implied) or apparent, and the scope of each type determines what acts bind the principal. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): The capacity or state of acting or exerting power; the ability of individuals to act independently and make free choices; a medium through which power is exerted; the office or function of an agent; an establishment doing business for another. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The faculty of acting or exerting power; the state of being in action; instrumentality; the office of an agent or factor; the place of business of an agent. The ordinary English senses of agency — personal autonomy, philosophical free will, or abstract instrumentality — have no foothold in legal doctrine. A legal researcher encountering "agency" in a historical source should not read philosophical capacity into it. More practically, the word's casual use to mean any business office or establishment (a travel agency, a staffing agency) can obscure whether a given historical document is describing a legal relationship of authority or merely a commercial location. ---
Common Confusion
Agency (private law) vs. Agency (administrative/public law): These share a word but operate under different bodies of doctrine. Private-law agency governs the principal-agent relationship and is largely common law. Administrative agency law governs the structure, authority, and accountability of government bodies and is predominantly statutory and constitutional. Conflating the two produces serious research errors, particularly in sources that predate the modern administrative state, where "agency" almost always means the private-law relationship. Agency vs. Employment: Not all employees are agents, and not all agents are employees. The distinguishing feature is authority to bind the principal in legal relations with third parties. An employee who lacks that authority is not an agent in the legal sense. Conversely, an independent contractor may be an agent if given authority to act on the principal's behalf. Historical sources often treat these categories loosely. Agency vs. Power of Attorney: A power of attorney is an instrument that confers agency authority; it is not synonymous with the agency relationship itself. The agency relationship can exist without a formal instrument. ---
Core Elements
The private-law agency relationship requires: Consent of both parties: The principal must consent to have the agent act on their behalf; the agent must consent to act. Agency cannot be imposed unilaterally on either party, though consent may be implied from conduct. Authority: The agent must have authority — actual or apparent — for acts to bind the principal. Actual authority arises from the principal's express or implied grant. Apparent authority arises when the principal's conduct leads a third party reasonably to believe the agent is authorized, even if no actual authority exists. Action on the principal's behalf: The agent must be acting for the principal, not in the agent's own interest or for a third party's account. Control: The principal retains the right to direct and control the manner of the agent's performance. This element distinguishes agency from other relationships (such as independent contracting in its purest form) and is the analytical pivot in many disputed classification cases. Legal capacity: Both principal and agent must have sufficient legal capacity. A principal who lacks capacity cannot ratify acts done in their name, a point with significant implications in historical sources dealing with minors, married women under coverture, and corporations acting ultra vires. ---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES General agency: The agent is authorized to act for the principal in all matters of a particular class or in all matters generally. Acts within the class bind the principal even if specific instructions were not given. Special agency: The agent is authorized for a specific transaction or limited purpose only. Third parties dealing with a special agent take the risk that the act falls outside the granted authority. Gratuitous agency: The agent acts without compensation. Historically significant because gratuitous agents were sometimes treated differently in negligence and duty analyses. Burrill and Bouvier both note that a formally appointed gratuitous agent is commonly designated an attorney — a usage that causes confusion in historical sources where "attorney" may mean agent-without-compensation rather than lawyer. Agency by ratification: The principal retroactively approves an act performed without prior authority, which binds the principal as if authority had existed from the outset. Agency by estoppel: Where a principal's conduct induces reasonable reliance by a third party, the principal may be estopped from denying the agency even where no actual authority was granted. Undisclosed agency: The agent acts without revealing the existence of a principal. The undisclosed principal may still be bound and may enforce contracts made on their behalf, subject to important limitations that vary historically and by jurisdiction. ---
Why It Matters in Research
Scope of authority is the central battleground. Nearly every agency dispute in historical sources turns on whether the agent's act was within actual or apparent authority. Researchers tracing the evolution of apparent authority doctrine will find significant divergence between early sources — which required more explicit authorization — and modern doctrine's broader protection of third-party reliance. Black's 1st and 2nd editions reflect the transitional period; Bouvier is more conservative. The gratuitous agent / attorney conflation is a persistent trap. In cases and treatises predating the late nineteenth century, "attorney" frequently means an agent authorized to act in another's name — often gratuitously — not a licensed lawyer. Rapalje & Lawrence notes this directly. Misreading "attorney" as legal counsel rather than authorized agent can badly distort the meaning of pre-Civil War decisions and pleadings. The corporate agency problem: When the principal is a corporation, agency analysis intersects with ultra vires doctrine and questions of officer authority. Historical sources often elide these distinctions. Pre-twentieth century sources may treat a corporate officer's unauthorized act as simply void; modern doctrine is more nuanced about ratification and apparent authority in the corporate context. Administrative agency research requires a complete reset. Do not carry private-law agency assumptions into administrative law materials. The question of whether an administrative agency has authority to act is a question of statutory delegation and constitutional limits, not consent and control in the private-law sense. The Law Mind Administrative Law & Government Encyclopedia covers this separately. Ratification and estoppel are frequently under-analyzed in older sources. The encyclopedia entry on ratification and estoppel in agency provides essential supplementary doctrine for researchers working with historical cases where authority was initially absent or disputed. Termination rules matter for historical transactional research. Agency terminates by act of the parties or by operation of law (death, insolvency, impossibility). In historical sources, the death of the principal immediately terminates the agency — a rule that could strand third parties who dealt with the agent in good faith after the principal's death without knowledge of it. Modern statutes in many jurisdictions have modified this rule, but the common law baseline remains controlling for historical analysis. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The five source dictionaries present a coherent core definition with instructive variation at the margins. Black's 1st edition emphasizes agency as a contract — drawing on Livermore's treatise — and frames the relationship in terms of one party confiding management of affairs to another who undertakes to render an account. This contractual framing is characteristic of the period and subtly different from the modern relational framing, which focuses less on accounting obligations and more on authority and third-party effects. Black's 2nd edition advances to a cleaner relational definition: a relation created by express or implied contract or by law, expressly including law as a source (not merely contract), and explicitly enumerating agent, attorney, proxy, and delegate as synonyms. The inclusion of "proxy" and "delegate" in the list of agent-synonyms reflects the broader usage of the era and is a useful reminder that historical sources may use those terms where a modern source would simply say agent. Bouvier adds the Prof. Joel Parker formulation, which centers the definition on authorization to act in relation to the rights or property of another — a framing that is useful for research involving property transactions, where agency questions about authority to convey or encumber real property arise frequently. Burrill is the most concise, treating agency as the relation or office of an agent, the administration of another's business by their appointment. Burrill's cross-reference to Procuration is significant: the Latin procuratio captures the older Roman-law lineage of the concept and appears in historical sources dealing with formal instruments of appointment, particularly in commercial and maritime contexts. Rapalje & Lawrence's entry, as excerpted, diverges into criminal law (age of criminal responsibility), which appears to be a source extraction artifact rather than a substantive definition of agency. Researchers should note this and not weight that source for the agency definition itself. None of the historical dictionaries fully anticipates the administrative law meaning of agency. That usage was not established in its modern form when most of these sources were compiled. Researchers should treat historical dictionary definitions of agency as confined to the private-law relationship. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The private-law agency relationship is largely uniform across common law jurisdictions in its foundational structure, but significant variation exists in the treatment of apparent authority, undisclosed principals, and the effect of the principal's death on third-party rights. Louisiana, drawing on civil law traditions, treats agency (mandát) through a separate doctrinal lens; researchers working with Louisiana materials should consult civilian sources alongside common law authorities. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Agency — Ratification and Estoppel in Agency (The Law Mind Business Organizations & Corporate Law Encyclopedia) Agency — Termination of Agency Relationships (The Law Mind Business Organizations & Corporate Law Encyclopedia) Subdelegation of Agency Authority and Internal Agency Procedures (The Law Mind Administrative Law & Government Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Principal (agency) | Agent | Apparent authority | Actual authority | Ratification | Estoppel | Power of attorney | Respondeat superior | Vicarious liability | Undisclosed principal | Scope of employment | Mandate | Procuration | Administrative agency | Delegation of authority | Independent contractor | Fiduciary | Attorney-in-fact
AGENCYmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
The contract of agency may be defined to be a contract by which one of the contracting parties confides the manage- ment of some affair, to be transacted on his account, to the other party, who undertakes to do the business and render an account of it. 1 Liverm. Prin. & Ag. 2. A contract by which one person, with greater or less discretionary power, under- takes to represent another in certain business relations. Whart. Ag. 1. A relation between two or more persons, by which one party, usually called the agent or attorney, is authorized to do certain acts for, or in relation to the rights or property of the other, who is denominated the principal, constituent, or employer. Bouvier, quoting Prof. Joel Parker, MS. Lect. 1851. AGENCY, DEED OF. A revocable and voluntary trust for payment of debts. Whar- ton. the formal instrument by which an agency is created. Paley, Ag. (Dunl. Ed.) 1, n. Classification. Agents are either general or special. A general agent is one employed in his capacity as a professional man or master of an art or trade, or one to whom the principal confides his whole business or all transactions or functions of a designated class. A special agent is one employed to con- duct a particular transaction or authorized to perform a specified act. Agents employed for the sale of goods or merchandise are called "mercantile agents." and are of two principal classes,-brokers and factors, (q. v.;) a factor is sometimes called a "commission agent," or "commission merchant." Russ. Merc. Ag. 1. Synonyms. The term "agent" is to be distinguished from its synonyms "servant," "representative," and "trustee." A serv- ant acts in behalf of his master and under the latter's direction and authority, but is re- garded as a mere instrument, and not as the substitute or proxy of the master. A repre- sentative (such as an executor or an assignee in bankruptcy) owes his power and authority to the law, which puts him in the place of the person represented, although the latter may have designated or chosen the representative. A trustee acts in the interest and for the bene- fit of one person, but by an authority derived from another person. In international law. A diplomatic agent is a person employed by a sovereign to manage his private affairs, or those of his
AGENCYmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
A relation between two or more persons, by which one party, usually called the agent or attorney, is authorized to do certain acts for, or in relation to the rights or property of, the other, who is denominated the principal, constituent, or employer. Prof. Joel Parker, MS. Lect. 1851. A contract by which one person, with greater or less discretionary power, under- takes to represent another in certain busi- ness relations. Whart. Ag. 1. The right on the part of the agent to act, is termed his authority or power. In some instances the au- thority or power must be exercised in the name of the principal, and the act done is for his benefit alone: In others, it may be executed in the name of the agent, and if the power is coupled with an in- terest on the part of the agent, it may be executed for his own benefit; Prof. Joel Parker, Harvard Law School Lect. 1851. The creation of the agency, when express, may be either by deed, in writing not by deed, or by a verbal delegation of authority; 2 Kent 612; 9 Ves. 250; 11 Mass. 27, 97, 288; 1 Binn. 450; 4 Johns. Ch. 667. When the agency is not express, it may be inferred from the relation of the parties and the nature of the employment, without proof of any express appointment; 2 Kent 613; 15 East 400; 1 Wash. Va. 19: 5 Day 556. Where relations exist which will con- stitute agency, it will be such whether the parties understand it to be or not; 72 Tex. 115. The admissions of a supposed agent cannot prove the existence of the agency: 23 III. App. 116; 48 id. 659; 35 Kan. 391; 70 Hun 568; 51 Minn. 141; 116 Mo. 51. In most of the ordinary transactions of business the agency is either conferred verbally, or is implied from circumstances. But where the act is required to be done in the name of the principal by deed. the au- thority to the agent must also be by deed, unless the principal be present and verbally or impliedly authorize the agent to fix his name to the deed; 1 Liverm. Ag. 35: Paley,. Ag. 157; Story, Ag. SS 49.51; 5 Binn. 613; 1 Wend. 424; 9 id. 54, 68; 12 id. 525; 14 S. & R. 331. The authority may be general, when it extends to all acts connected with a partic- ular business or employment; or special, when it is confined to a single act; Story, Ag. § 17; Mech. Ag. 284, 285;21 Wend. 279 ; 9 Ν. Η. 263; 3 Blackf. 436; 82 Cal. 1. If the powers are special, they form the limits of the authority; if general, they will be more liberally construed, according to the necessities of the occasion and the course of the transaction. The agency must be antecedently given, or subsequently adopted; and in the latter case there must be an act of recognition, or an acquiescence in the act of the agent from which a recognition may be fairly implied; 2 Kent 614. If, with full knowledge of what the agent has done, the principal/ ratify the act, the ratification will be equiv- alent to an original authority,-according to the maxim, omnis ratihabitio retrotra- hitur et mandato æquiparatur; Paley, Ag. 172; 4 Ex. 798. The ratification relates back to the original making of the contract; 31 L. J. Ex. 163; 57 Fed. Rep. 973; except as to intermediate vested rights; 4 Ct. Cl. 511; 49 Ill. 59; 43 Mo. 113; 12 Minn. 255. It must be ratified in its entirety; 31 N. Y. 611; 1 Oreg. 115; 45 Ga. 153; 27 Mo. 163; 31 Iowa 547; 24 Neb. 653; 15 So. Rep. (La.) 16; and subject to the charges imposed by the agent; 9 H. L. C. 391. If the prin- cipal accepts the benefit of a contract, he is responsible for the fraudulent represent- ations of the agent, although made without authority; 85 Tenn. 139; 40 Minn. 476; 78 Cal. 490; 157 Mass. 248; 65 Hun 182; 144 Pa. 398. An intention to ratify may be presumed from the silence of the principal who has received a letter from the agent informing him of what has been done on his account; 12 Wall. 358; 2 Biss. 255; 105 Mass. 551; 49 Pa. 457; 69 id. 426; 21 Mich. 374; 37 111. 442; 26 Iowa 38; 27 Tex. 120; 13 Colo. 69; or from any acts inconsist- ent with a contrary presumption; .26 Me. 84; 69 Pa. 426; 59 Ill. 23; 12 Kan. 185; or from a suit by the principal; 56 Me. 564 ; 21 Ark. 539; 28 III. 135; 9 B & C. 59; 12 Wall. 681; 12 Johns. 300; 8 Cow. N. Y. 281; 4 Wash. C. C. 549; 14 S. & R. 30; or by adoption of a submission to arbitration, although the agent exceeded his authority; 57 Conn. 105; or by keeping and enforcing a mortgage, obtained by an agent for the release of another mortgage; 63 Mich. 599. Ratification can only take place where the agent professed to act for the person rati- fying; 5 B. & C. 909; Leake, Cont. 470. Thus a forged signature to a note cannot be ratified; L. R. 6 Ex. 89; contra, 46 Me. 176; 32 III. 387; 33 Conn. 95; 42 Pa. 143; Whart. Ag. § 71. A principal cannot ratify the acts of his agent where he has no knowledge of such acts; 71 Md. 200; 76 Ia. 129. The acts of the agent must be disap- proved within a reasonable time after notice, or the principal will be considered as having ratified them by his silence; 45 La. Ann. 847. The business of th
AGENCYmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888
lated by the statute law of the several BAILMENT.) A gratuitous agent when formally appointed is commonly called an attorney (q. v.) States. 2. In criminal law a child under the age of seven years is incapable of committing a crime, and no act done by a child between seven and fourteen is a crime unless it be shown affirmatively that it had sufficient capacity to know that the act was wrong. Steph. Cr. Dig. 15. 3. Full age. In the old books, "age is commonly used to signify "full age;" that is, the age of twenty-one years. Litt. 259. See NONAGE. AGE, OF FULL, (when infant becomes). 1 Bl. Com. 463; 1 Chit. Gen. Pr. 766; 1 Salk. 44; 1 Sid. 162; 5 Halst. (N. J.) 137. AGE PRAYER, or PRIER.-A statement or suggestion formerly made in a real action to which an infant was a party, of the fact of his nonage, with a request that the proceedings be stayed until he should come of age. It is no longer in use. act AGENCY-AGENT.-LATIN: agere, to 1. An agent is a person who acts on 24. Remunerated. - Where the agent is entitled to be paid for his services, the agency consists of a contract by the agent to perform the services, and by the princi pal to pay him for them. On the other hand, the principal is entitled to demand an account from his agent. 25. Mercantile. - Agents employed for the sale of goods or merchandise are called mercantile agents, and are of two principal classes-brokers and factors (q. v.); a factor is sometimes called a commission agent, or commission merchant, (Russ Merc. Ag. 1) but in practice the latter terms seem to be frequently used to denote an agent who purchases goods for his principal, while "factor" generally means an agent for sale. A commission agent stands in the relation of vendor (as well as agent) to his principal, because the persons from whom he buys the goods sell to him and not to his principal. L. R. 5 H. L. 395. behalf of another person (the principal). The status of an agent, or the relation 86. General and special.-As regards between him and his principal, is called the extent of the agent's authority (q. v.) agency. (See PRINCIPAL AND AGENT.) The he is either general or special: a general general rule is, that whatever a person can agent is one who is empowered to act for do in his own right he may appoint an his principal in all business of a particuagent to do for him; but an agent, execular kind (e. g. to conduct a business or tor, trustee, &c., cannot himself delegate branch of a business, or purchase goods his office, because the power which he possesses is not in his own right. Smith Merc. L. 109. See DELEGATUS NON POTEST DELEGARE; MINISTERIAL; SUBSTITUTION. 12. As regards third persons, agency is merely a mode by which a person can do acts through the medium of another buy a horse, execute a deed, or the like, person; an act done by an agent within Smith Merc. L. 128; Chit. Cont. 193; Russ. the scope of his authority binds the prinMerc. Ag. 61), and whose ordinary occupacipal in the same manner as if the princition is not to do such acts. In the case of a pal himself had done it; thus, if I authorgeneral agent, the principal is bound by all acts done by him within the scope of his ordinary employment, whether such acts were warranted by his private instructions ize A. to buy goods for me, and A. does so, I am liable to pay for them. of a particular kind from time to time) or one who, though only appointed by his principal to do a particular act, is by occupation an agent, such as a banker or horsedealer. A special agent is one who is authorized to do a particular act, (e. g. to 13. Gratuitous. As regards the principal and the agent inter se, agents are or not, while in the case of a special agent of two kinds-gratuitous and remunerated. the principal is only bound if the agent In the case of a gratuitous agency, the acts according to his particular commisprincipal cannot compel the agent to sion or authority. Russ. 61. See DEL enter on the agency, that is, to act as his CREDERE; POWER OF ATTORNEY; AUTHORagent, unless the contract is under seal; ITY; RATIFICATION; ULTRA VIRES. but a gratuitous agent who acts as such is 7. In criminal law, where one perliable for gross negligence. (Compare son with criminal intention causes another
AGENCYn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
The faculty of acting or of exerting power; the state of being in action; action; instrumentality. The superintendence and agency of Providence in the natural world. Woodward. The office of an agent, or factor; the relation between a principal and his agent; business of one intrusted with the concerns of another. The place of business of am agent.
agencynoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
The capacity, condition, or state of acting or of exerting power. | The capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own free choices. | A medium through which power is exerted or an end is achieved. | The office or function of an agent; also, the relationship between a principal and that person's agent. | An establishment engaged in doing business for another; also, the place of business or the district of such an agency. | A department or other administrative unit of a government; also, the office or headquarters of, or the district administered by, such unit of government.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In
The Law Mind Legal Dictionary. This is a legal research library, not a lawyer.
Dictionary • Encyclopedia • Sign In