AD TUNC ET IBIDEM

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

AD TUNC ET IBIDEMAuthored
The Law Mind • 734 words
Definition
Ad tunc et ibidem is a Latin phrase meaning "then and there." In criminal pleading, it is the technical name for the clause in an indictment that connects a material fact to the time and place already established earlier in the charging instrument — literally, the allegation that the person, object, or circumstance was "then and there being found." The phrase functions as a shorthand device in formal pleading. Once a date, year, and place have been stated with particularity in an indictment, subsequent averments of each distinct material fact must repeat the temporal and locational allegation. Rather than restating the full date and venue each time, pleaders would employ ad tunc et ibidem — "then and there" — to incorporate the previously specified time and place by reference.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering historical indictments — particularly those from English common law practice and early American criminal proceedings — will find this phrase appearing repeatedly in charging documents as a formulaic connector. Its presence signals that the drafter is tying an additional material fact back to the time and place established in the venue clause or an earlier averment, not introducing a new time or location. The practical trap: ad tunc et ibidem is not mere stylistic filler. At common law, the requirement to allege time and place for every distinct material fact was a substantive pleading rule, not a technicality. A defective or omitted ad tunc et ibidem clause could expose an indictment to challenge on a motion to quash or in arrest of judgment. Researchers reviewing historical indictments should understand that the phrase carried real procedural weight — its absence or misplacement was not harmless. This term appears almost exclusively in historical sources. Modern criminal pleading rules — especially following the adoption of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and analogous state reforms — abandoned the hyper-technical common law indictment form. Contemporary charging instruments do not use this phrase or the pleading conventions it served. Researchers working in post-reform materials will not encounter it in live practice. Corpus connections: This term belongs to the cluster of Latin pleading formulae that saturate pre-twentieth-century criminal records, treatises on common law pleading, and abridgements such as Bacon's Abridgement. Researchers consulting those sources should be familiar with the full vocabulary of formal indictment structure — venue clause, traversal, material averment — to situate ad tunc et ibidem correctly.
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (both the first and second editions) defines the term identically and concisely: the Latin name for the clause of an indictment containing the statement of the subject-matter "then and there being found." No elaboration is offered in either edition beyond this identification of function. Bouvier's Law Dictionary provides the most substantive treatment. Bouvier confirms the same core function but adds the critical procedural rule: in an indictment, the allegation of time and place must be repeated in the averment of every distinct material fact. After the day, year, and place have been stated once with certainty, ad tunc et ibidem serves as the repeating mechanism. Bouvier's citation to Bacon's Abridgement (Indictment, G. 4) and to early North Carolina Reports (1 No. C. 93) grounds the usage in accessible primary authorities. One entry in the Bouvier source material appears to be a database artifact — a passage concerning dower and real property that has no connection to this term. Researchers should disregard it; it does not reflect Bouvier's treatment of ad tunc et ibidem. All three historical dictionaries agree on the meaning. None provides significant divergence. What the historical sources collectively omit is any discussion of the consequences of a defective clause or the pleading reform trajectory that rendered the phrase obsolete — gaps a researcher should supply from treatise literature on common law criminal pleading.
Jurisdictional Note
Ad tunc et ibidem is a creature of English common law pleading practice and carried into early American criminal procedure. Its force was universal across common law jurisdictions during the period of formal indictment pleading. By the mid-twentieth century, procedural reform had eliminated the technical necessity of the phrase in virtually all American jurisdictions.
Related Terms
Venue clause — Indictment — Averment — Material fact (pleading) — Videlicet — Then and there — Common law pleading — Charging instrument — Motion to quash — Bacon's Abridgement
AD TUNC ET IBIDEMmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
In pleading. The Latin name of that clause of an indict- ment containing the statement of the subject- matter "then and there being found."
AD TUNC ET IBIDEMmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
recognized at the common law. 1 Washb. R. P. 149; 2 Bla. Com. 132. See DOWER.
AD TUNC ET IBIDEMmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
In Plead- ing. The technical name of that part of an indictment containing the statement of the subject-matter "then and there being found." Bacon, Abr. Indictment, G. 4:1 4; 1 No. C. 93. In an indictment, the allegation of time and place must be repeated in the averment of every distinct material fact; but after the day, year, and place have once been stated with certainty, it is after- wards, in subsequent allegations, sufficient to refer to them by the words et ad tunc et ibidem, and the effect of these words is equivalent to an actual rep- etition of the time and place. The ad tunc et ibi- dem must be added to every material fact in an in- dictment; Saund. 95. Thus, an indictment which alleged that J. S. at a certain time and place made an assault upon J. N., et eum cum gladio felonicè percussit, was held bad, because it was not said, ad tunc et ibidem percussit; Dy. 68, 69. And where, in an indictment for murder, it was stated that J. S. at a certain time and place, having a sword in his right hand, percussit J. N., without saying ad tunc et ibi. dem percussit, it was held insufficient for the time and place laid related to the having the sword, and consequently it was not said when or where the stroke was given; Cro. Eliz. 738 2 Hale, Pl. Cr. 178. And where the the indictment charged that A. B. at N., in the county afores id, made an assault upon C. D. of F. in the county aforesaid, and him ad tune et ibidem quodam gladio percussit, this indictment was held to be bad, because two places being named

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In