ACTION ON THE CASE - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

ACTION ON THE CASEAuthored

The Law Mind • 997 words

Definition

Action on the case is a common law form of personal action — also called trespass on the case, or simply "case" — that allowed a plaintiff to seek damages for injuries caused indirectly by the defendant's wrongful act, or for wrongs not covered by the more rigid writ of trespass. Its defining procedural characteristic was that the plaintiff's entire cause of complaint had to be set out at length in the original writ, making the writ specific to the facts of each individual situation rather than following a fixed formula. This adaptability gave the action its name: it was tailored to the plaintiff's particular case.

Action on the case was the primary vehicle for what we now recognize as negligence, nuisance, deceit, libel, slander, malicious prosecution, and many other tort claims. It also encompassed assumpsit — the precursor to modern contract actions — before assumpsit developed into a distinct form of action in its own right.

The action is now abolished in all common law jurisdictions that have adopted codes of civil procedure. Modern tort law largely descends from it.

Common Confusion

Action on the case is frequently conflated with the writ of trespass. The distinction was foundational to common law pleading: trespass lay for direct, forcible injuries (a blow, an immediate taking); action on the case lay for consequential or indirect injuries, and for wrongs that were not forcible or immediate. If a defendant threw a log and it struck the plaintiff, that was trespass. If the log was left in the road and the plaintiff later tripped over it, that was case. This direct/indirect distinction shaped the entire architecture of common law tort liability and explains why negligence — an indirect wrong — developed as it did. Researchers who encounter this distinction in historical sources should not assume the boundary was always clear; courts and pleaders disputed it regularly.

Action on the case should also be distinguished from action on the case in assumpsit. Assumpsit originated as a subtype of case (a promise-based wrong), but by the seventeenth century it had effectively separated into its own form, and historical sources may treat them as distinct.

Why It Matters in Research

This term is a gateway concept for anyone researching the history of tort law, contract law, or civil procedure. Several traps await researchers using historical sources:

First, the term appears in multiple compressed forms. Sources variously use "action on the case," "trespass on the case," and simply "case." These are synonyms in most contexts, but a reader unfamiliar with the equivalence may treat them as distinct causes of action and misread older pleading records or treatises.

Second, the scope of the action changed significantly over time. Early common law recognized action on the case only in limited circumstances. The Statute of Westminster II (1285) — In Consimili Casu — expanded the clerks' authority to issue writs in situations analogous to existing writs, and this is what allowed action on the case to grow into a broad, flexible remedy. Historical sources written before versus after this statutory expansion describe a materially different action.

Third, assumpsit's relationship to action on the case creates confusion in contract history research. Sources from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries will describe assumpsit as a species of case. By the nineteenth century, the two are typically treated as distinct. A researcher reading across this period must track the terminology carefully.

Fourth, abolition was uneven. English common law actions were abolished by the Common Law Procedure Act 1852 and consolidated further afterward. American jurisdictions abolished the forms of action at different times through their own procedural codes (the Field Code in New York, 1848, being the landmark American example). Some American sources from the late nineteenth century still use the old terminology even after formal abolition, as courts and commentators translated old doctrine into the new pleading vocabulary.

For Law Mind corpus researchers: action on the case is the historical ancestor of modern negligence and many intentional tort doctrines. When tracing how a particular tort was recognized or how its elements developed, the historical action on the case literature is indispensable primary material.

Historical Dictionary Support

The major historical dictionaries agree closely on the core definition. Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Burrill both define action on the case as a personal action of "very extensive application," synonymous with trespass on the case or simply "case," distinguished by the requirement that the plaintiff's full cause of complaint be set out in the original writ. All three cite Blackstone's Commentaries, Book III at page 122, as the authoritative source — a reliable citation to a real and findable text.

Bouvier adds the most substantive historical context, noting that the action existed only in limited form before the Statute of Westminster II, and that in its most comprehensive sense it includes assumpsit as well as actions in form ex delicto (sounding in tort). Bouvier also flags that by the time of his writing, "action on the case" in ordinary usage usually referred to the delictual (tort) form, not to assumpsit — a useful reminder that the term narrowed in common usage even before formal abolition.

What the historical dictionaries largely omit: they do not trace the doctrine of negligence as a substantive development out of this procedural form, and they do not address abolition or the transition to code pleading. A researcher relying solely on these sources will understand the form's structure but will need to look elsewhere — particularly to Pollock on Torts and Stephen's Pleading — for the doctrinal evolution and the post-abolition translation of case-based principles into modern law.

ACTION ON THE CASEmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

A species of personal action of very extensive applica- tion, otherwise called "trespass on the case," or simply "case," from the circumstance of the plaintiff's whole case or cause of com- plaint being set forth at length in the origi-

ACTION ON THE CASEmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

its exercise are still found. The vital idea of an action is, a proceeding on the part of one person as actor against another, for the infringement of some right of the first, before a court of justice, in the manner prescribed by the court or the law. Suborbinate to this is now connected in a quite common use, the idea of the answer of the defendant or person proceeded against; the adducing evidence by each party to sustain his position; the adjudi- cation of the court upon the right of the plaintiff; and the means taken to enforce the right or recom- pense the wrong done, in case the right is established and shown to have been injuriously affected. Actions are to be distinguished from those pro- ceedings, such as writ of error, scire facias, man- damus, and the like, where, under the form of pro- ceedings, the court, and not the plaintiff, appears to be the actor; 6 Binn. 9. And the term is not regu- larly applied, it would seem, to proceedings in a court of equity; 8 S. C. 417; 71 Pa. 170. In the Civil Law. Civil Actions. Those personal actions which are instituted to compel payments or do some other thing purely civil. Pothier, Introd. Gen. aux Coutumes 110. Criminal Actions. Those personal ac- tions in which the plaintiff asks reparation for the commission of some tort or injury which he or those who belong to him have sustained. Mixed Actions are those which partake of the nature of both real and personal ac- tions; as, actions of partition, actions to re- cover property and damages. Just. Inst. 4, 6, 18-20; Domat, Supp. des Lois Civiles liv. 4, tit. 1, n. 4. Mixed Personal Actions are those which partake of both a civil and a criminal char- acter. Personal Actions are those in which one person (actor) sues another as defendant (reus) in respect of some obligation which he is under to the actor, either ex contractu or ex delicto, to perform some act or make some compensation. Real Actions. Those by which a person seeks to recover his property which is in the possession of another. In the Common Law. The action properly is said to terminate at judgment; Co. Litt. 289 a; Rolle, Abr. 291; 3 Bla. Com. 116; 3 Bouvier, Inst. n. 2639. Civil Actions. -Those actions which have for their object the recovery of private or civil rights, or of compensation for their infraction. Criminal Actions. Those actions prose- cuted in a court of justice, in the name of the government, against one or more in- dividuals accused of a crime. See 1 Chitty, Crim. Law. Local Actions. Those civil actions which can be brought only in the county or other territorial jurisdiction in which the cause of action arose. See LOCAL ACTION. Mired Actions. Those which partake of the nature of both real and personal actions. See MIXED ACTION. Personal Actions. Those civil actions which are brought for the recovery of per- sonal property, for the enforcement of some contract, or to recover damages for the commission of an injury to the person or property. See PERSONAL ACTION. Real Actions. Those brought for the specific recovery of lands, tenements, or hereditaments. Steph. PL. 3. See REAL

ACTION ON THE CASEmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

This was a remedy given by the common law, but it appears to have existed only in a limited form and to a certain extent until the statute of Westminster 2d. In its most compre- hensive signification it includes assumpsit as well as an action in form ex delicto; at present when it is mentioned it is usually

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In