ACCOUNT STATED

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

ACCOUNT STATEDAuthored
The Law Mind • 1126 words
Definition
An account stated is an agreement between parties who have had prior financial dealings that a particular balance is correct and due. It arises when one party renders an account — a statement of debits and credits — and the other party accepts it, either expressly or by failing to object within a reasonable time. Once established, an account stated operates as a new, independent obligation: the underlying transactions merge into the agreed balance, and the creditor may sue on the account stated itself rather than on the individual items that compose it. Three practical consequences follow. First, the debtor's acceptance — whether by signature, verbal agreement, or silence — creates a form of admission that the balance is correct. Second, the statute of limitations runs from the date the account was stated, not from the dates of the underlying transactions. Third, the agreed balance presumptively displaces disputes about individual items, though a party may still attack the account on grounds of fraud, mistake, or duress.
Common Confusion
Account stated is frequently confused with open account (or account current), which refers to a running series of transactions where no final balance has yet been struck and agreed upon. An open account is the raw material; an account stated is what results when the parties settle on the final number. A second source of confusion is with accord and satisfaction: both involve an agreement that resolves a prior obligation, but accord and satisfaction requires consideration and typically involves a disputed claim, while an account stated presupposes that the balance is acknowledged as correct. A creditor cannot manufacture an account stated by sending an invoice to a debtor who has never agreed to the amount; agreement — at minimum through the absence of timely objection — is the essential element.
Core Elements
For an account stated to be established, courts generally require: 1. Prior transactions. The parties must have had pre-existing financial dealings giving rise to a debt. An account stated cannot create a new obligation from scratch; it settles one already in existence. 2. Rendition of account. The creditor must present a statement of the balance owed. This may be a formal invoice, a ledger summary, or any communication that specifies the amount claimed. 3. Assent by the debtor. Assent may be express (written or oral acknowledgment) or implied by law. Implication most commonly arises from the debtor's silence: retaining a rendered account for an unreasonable period without objection is treated as acceptance. The period is fact-dependent and varies by jurisdiction. 4. Agreement on a definite balance. There must be a sum certain. An account stated cannot rest on a contingent debt or an unliquidated claim — the balance must be fixed.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter account stated across three distinct legal contexts, and conflating them creates navigational errors. First, account stated is a common count in contract pleading. In older common-law practice, it appeared routinely as one of the standard counts in an assumpsit declaration. Researchers reading pre-twentieth-century pleadings should expect to see it alongside other common counts (money had and received, quantum meruit) as boilerplate rather than a signal that account stated was the actual legal theory in dispute. Second, the doctrine has a commercial history tied to merchant law and, later, to banking and credit relationships. Bouvier's entry traces the underlying account action's origins in proceedings against bailiffs and receivers and its extension to merchants — a lineage that explains why account stated appears heavily in nineteenth-century cases involving factors, commission merchants, and bank customers. Researchers working in that period should read account stated cases against the broader law-merchant background. Third, account stated has a modern life in consumer debt collection litigation, where credit card companies and debt buyers routinely rely on the theory when suing on delinquent accounts. This creates a large body of contemporary case law that may look entirely unlike the nineteenth-century commercial precedents. The implied-assent doctrine is particularly litigated here: courts disagree about how long silence must persist and whether monthly billing statements constitute a proper rendition of account. A research trap: because account stated is a theory of recovery, not a cause of action tied to a specific statute, it appears in case law under varying headings — contract, debt, assumpsit, quantum meruit — depending on era and jurisdiction. Full-corpus searching should include historical synonyms and pleading forms.
Historical Dictionary Support
The three source dictionaries converge on the core definition — a balance struck and assented to — but each contributes something distinct. Black's is the most procedurally oriented, emphasizing account stated as a common count in a declaration and noting that it allowed the plaintiff to prove an absolute acknowledgment by the defendant. This framing reflects the term's role in the formalistic world of common-law pleading, where choosing the right count was as important as proving the underlying facts. Bouvier's provides the most analytical depth, distinguishing between the legal and equitable dimensions of account actions generally and offering the useful clarification that a disputed item does not prevent the remainder of an account from being stated as to the undisputed items. Bouvier's also notes the contingency limitation — that a debt payable on a contingency cannot form the basis of an account stated — which remains good law. Burrill's definition, attributed to Chief Justice Parker, is the most compressed: "an account balanced and rendered, with an assent to such balance, express or implied." This formulation captures the doctrine precisely and was frequently cited by nineteenth-century courts. What the historical dictionaries collectively underemphasize is the modern doctrine's treatment of implied assent through silence, which has become far more litigated as billing-statement cases proliferate. Historical sources treat implied assent as a natural extension of the doctrine; contemporary courts impose stricter scrutiny, particularly in consumer contexts.
Jurisdictional Note
Most U.S. jurisdictions recognize account stated, but the implied-assent standard varies: some states require a specific period of silence (often thirty to ninety days), while others apply a general reasonableness test. California has a substantial body of account stated case law arising from consumer debt litigation, and its courts have addressed the doctrine's interaction with the statute of limitations in detail. Researchers should not assume that the implied-assent rules of one jurisdiction transfer cleanly to another.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Fiduciary Accounting — Principles, Standards, and the Uniform Fiduciary Accounting Principles (The Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia) [estates_158] Contested Accountings and Objections to Fiduciary Conduct (The Law Mind Trusts, Estates & Probate Encyclopedia) [estates_160]
Related Terms
Open account; account current; common count; assumpsit; accord and satisfaction; quantum meruit; liquidated debt; money had and received; statute of limitations (accrual); rendition of account; implied assent; debt (cause of action)
ACCOUNT STATEDmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
The settlement D of an account between the parties, with a balance struck in favor of one of them; an account rendered by the creditor, and by the debtor assented to as correct, either express- ly, or by implication of law from the failure E to object. F This was also a common count in a decla- ration upon a contract under which the plain- tiff might prove an absolute acknowledgment by the defendant of a liquidated demand of a fixed amount, which implies a promise to pay on request. It might be joined with any other count for a money demand. The ac- knowledgment or admission must have been G made to the plaintiff or his agent. Whar- ton.
ACCOUNT STATEDmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
At Law. The action lay against bailiffs, receivers, and guardians, in socage only, at the common law, and. by a subsequent ex- tension of the law, between merchants; 11 Co. 89: 12 Mass. 149. Privity of contract was required, and it did not lie by or against executors and ad- ministrators; 1 Wms. Saund. 216, n.; Willes 208, until statutes were passed for that purpose, the last being that of 3 & 4 Anne, c. 16: 1 Story, Eq. Jur. § 445. In several states of the United States, the action has received a liberal extension; 13 Vt. 517; 7 Pa. 175; 25 Conn. 137; 5 R. I. 402. Thus, it is said to be the proper remedy for one partner against another; 3 Binn. 317; 10 S. & R. 220; 2 Conn. 425; 4 Vt. 137:3 Barb. 419; 1 Cal. 448; for money used by one partner after the dissolu- tion of the firm; 18 Pick. 299; though equity seems to be properly resorted to where a separate tribunal exists; 1 Hen. & M. 9; 1 Johns. Ch. 305. And see 1 Metc. 216; 1 Iowa 240. In other states, reference may be made to an auditor by order of the court, in the com- mon forms of actions founded on contract or tort, where there are complicated ac- counts or counter-demands; 6 Pick. 193;8 Conn. 499; 13 N. H. 275; 1 Tex. 646. See
ACCOUNT STATEDmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
An agreed bal- ance of accounts. An account which has been examined and accepted by the parties. 2 Atk. 251. An account cannot become an account stated with reference to a debt payable on a contingency: 76 Cal. 96. Although an item of an account may be disputed, it may become an account stated as to the items admittedly correct; 53 Mo. App. 263. In Equity. Acceptance may be inferred from circumstances, as where an account is rendered to a merchant, and no objection is made, after sufficient time; 1 Sim. & S. 333; 3 Johns. Ch. 569; 7 Cra. 147; 1 M'Cord, Ch. 156; 2 Md. Ch. Dec. 433; 10 Barb. 213. Such an account is deemed conclusive between the parties; 2 Bro. Ch. 62, 310;2 Ves. 566, 837; 20 Ala. N. S. 747; 3 Johns. Ch. 587; 1 Gill 350; 3 Jones, Eq. 109; to the extent agreed upon; 1 Hopk. Ch. 239; un- less some fraud, mistake, or plain error is shown; 1 Johns. Ch. 550; 1 McCord, Ch. 156; and in such case, generally, the ac- count will not be opened, but liberty to sur- charge or falsify will be given; 9 Ves. 265; 1 Sch. & L. 192; 7 Gill 119. At Law. An account stated is conclu- sive as to the liability of the parties, with reference to the transactions included in it; 3 Johns. Ch.; except in cases of fraud or manifest error: 1 Esp. 159; 24 Conn. 591; 4 Wis. 219; 5 Fla. 478. See 4 Sandf. 311; 83 Va. 432. Acceptance by the party to be charged must be shown by the one who relies upon the account; 10 Humphr. 238; 12 III. 111. The acknowledgment that the sum is due is sufficient; 2 Term 480; though there be but a single item in the account; 13 East 249; 5 M. & S. 65. Acceptance may also be inferred from re- taining the account a sufficient time with- out making objection; 7 Cr. 147; 8 W. & S. 109; 10 Barb. 213; 4 Sandf. 311; see 22 Pa. 454; and from other circumstances; 1 Gill 234. The rule that delay in objecting to an account stated is an acquiescence also applies to corporations; 2 Blatchf. 354. If the parties had already come to a dis- agreement when the account is rendered, assent cannot be inferred from silence; 38 Fed. Rep. 635; the acceptance need not be in express terms; 65 Mo. 658; 81 N. Y. 268. A definite ascertained sum must be stated to be due; 9 S. & R. 241. It must be made by a competent person, excluding infants and those who are of un- sound mind; 1 Term 40; and an infant or an insane person is not concluded by an account stated; 1 Chit. Cont. 187. Husband and wife may join and state an account with a third person; 2 Term 483; 16 Eng. L. & Eq. 290. An agent may bind his principal; 3 Johns. Ch. 569; but he must show his authority; 4 Wend. 394; 13 Hun 392. Partners may state accounts; and an action lies for the party entitled to the balance; 4 Dall. 434; 1 Wash. C. C. 435; 16 Vt. 169. The acceptance of the account is an ac- knowledgment of a debt due for the bal- ance, and will support assumpsit. It is not, therefore, necessary to prove the items, but only to prove an existing debt or demand, and the stating of the account; 16 Ala. N. s. 742; 74 Cal. 60. Facts known to a party when he settles an account stated cannot be used later to impeach it; 53 Mo. App. 610; and it should not be set aside except for clear showing of fraud or mistake; 51 Fed. Rep. 117; 66 Hun 626; 53 Mo. App. 610.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In