ACATE

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

ACATEAuthored
The Law Mind • 550 words
Definition
An archaic legal term referring to provisions or food purchased for a household, particularly food bought (as opposed to produced) for use in a noble or royal establishment. In early English law, the term appears in administrative and household contexts, designating victuals or supplies procured by purchase. Burrill's Law Dictionary treats ACATE as a variant of ACHATE, directing the reader there rather than supplying an independent definition. ---
Common Confusion
ACATE and ACHATE are variant spellings of the same term and should not be treated as distinct legal concepts. Burrill's cross-reference confirms they are interchangeable. Researchers should also be careful not to conflate ACATE with ACATER or CATERER — the officer responsible for purchasing provisions — which is a related but distinct term referring to the person rather than the provisions themselves. ---
Why It Matters in Research
ACATE is primarily a term of historical significance, encountered in medieval English records, household accounts, and early legal texts rather than in case law or statutes. Researchers working with manorial records, royal household ordinances, or early English administrative documents may encounter the term in its original spelling or in variant forms. The key navigational point is that Burrill himself does not define ACATE directly but redirects to ACHATE — a common pattern in historical dictionaries where variant spellings were cross-referenced rather than given independent treatment. Any researcher following a citation trail should look to ACHATE as the substantive entry. The term has essentially no modern legal life. It does not appear in contemporary statutes, regulations, or case reporters in any operative sense. Researchers encountering it in a source should treat it as a historical descriptor of provisioning arrangements, not as a term carrying enforceable legal meaning. It surfaces most reliably in transcriptions of medieval household rolls, pipe rolls, and early English administrative records where the purchasing of food for a lord's establishment was a matter of some legal and fiscal consequence — touching on the rights and duties of officials called acatours or caterers. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary offers no independent definition, treating ACATE as a simple cross-reference to ACHATE. This is the full extent of Burrill's treatment. The brevity is itself informative: by the mid-nineteenth century, when Burrill compiled his dictionary, the term was already obsolete enough that no extended analysis was warranted. Burrill's cross-reference structure suggests that ACHATE was the preferred or more authoritative spelling in the legal sources he consulted. Historical dictionaries generally do not treat ACATE with any depth. The term belongs more naturally to the history of the English language and to the literature of medieval household administration than to legal doctrine proper. Its legal significance, such as it was, derived from the administrative organization of great households and the Crown's provisioning apparatus — a context that disappeared long before modern legal terminology was systematized. ---
Related Terms
ACHATE — the preferred Burrill spelling; the substantive entry for this concept ACATER — the officer or agent who purchased provisions; the human role corresponding to this term PURVEYANCE — the Crown's prerogative right to purchase provisionsoften at below-market rates; the broader legal doctrine within which household provisioning operated VICTUALLING — general term for the supply of foodrelevant in later statutory and maritime contexts
ACATEmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867
See Achate. ACC., ACCORD. Abbreviations of the Fr. accordant, and Eng. accordingly; frequently used in the books, especially in the VOL. I. ACCAPITARE, Acapitare, Acaptare. L. Lat. [from caput, head, or chief.] In old English law. To pay homage to a chief lord, on becoming his vassal. Bract. fol. 78 a. Fleta, lib. 3, c. 16, § 6. To acknowledge the sovereignty of a chief lord in special cases, as against a mesne; to attorn; (acapitare et se atturnare.) Bract. fol. 389 a. Fleta, lib. 3, c. 16, § 38. Id. lib. 6, c. 28, § 1. To attorn to another person than the chief lord, and in derogation of his rights. Fleta, lib. 2, c. 50, § 16. To pay a relief to a chief lord. Montesquieu, Esprit des Loix, liv. 31, c. 24, note.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In