ABATEMENT

6 definitions found across Law Mind sources

ABATEMENTAuthored
The Law Mind • 1570 words • Verified
Definition
Abatement is the reduction, suspension, termination, or defeat of something — a legal proceeding, a tax liability, a nuisance, or a property right — that would otherwise continue or take full effect. Because the term operates across several distinct legal contexts, it carries different technical meanings depending on the field: 1. PLEADING (historical). A defendant's successful plea showing that the plaintiff's writ or declaration was defective in form or substance — that the wrong parties were named, that the plaintiff described the cause of action incorrectly, or that some procedural prerequisite was unmet. A plea in abatement did not defeat the underlying claim permanently; it suspended the action, forcing the plaintiff to correct the defect and recommence properly. It was a dilatory defense, not a final judgment on the merits. 2. NUISANCE. The suppression or removal of a nuisance — whether by court order, by public authority, or in limited circumstances by a private individual acting to protect against immediate harm. Abatement of a nuisance ends the offending condition rather than merely compensating for it. 3. PROBATE AND WILLS. The proportional reduction of bequests or devises when the assets of an estate are insufficient to satisfy all gifts in full. When an estate cannot pay its debts and also honor all testamentary gifts, legacies abate — typically in a set order (residuary, then general, then specific) — until the estate's obligations are met. 4. TAX. The cancellation or reduction of a tax assessment, penalty, or interest charge by a taxing authority. A taxpayer who demonstrates reasonable cause, qualifies under a first-time abatement program, or successfully challenges an erroneous assessment may obtain abatement of amounts otherwise owed. 5. FREEHOLD INTRUSION (archaic). The wrongful entry by a stranger into freehold land after the death of the previous owner and before the heir has taken possession. This usage is now largely obsolete but appears in older property and pleading texts. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): The act of abating or the state of being abated; a lessening, diminution, or reduction; a moderation; removal or putting an end to. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The act of abating, or the state of being abated; a lessening, diminution, or reduction; removal or putting an end to; as, the abatement of a nuisance is the suppression thereof. Also: the amount abated; a rebate or discount allowed. The common meaning — simple reduction or lessening — is not wrong as far as it goes, but it collapses five legally distinct mechanisms into one intuitive idea. A researcher relying on the ordinary sense of "abatement" will miss the procedural precision of a plea in abatement (which is about defect and delay, not substantive defeat), the succession rules governing legacy abatement in probate, and the formal administrative process governing tax abatement. The word's familiarity is a trap: it sounds self-explanatory while pointing to very different legal consequences depending on context. ---
Common Confusion
ABATEMENT vs. BAR. A plea in abatement and a plea in bar are both defendant's defenses, but they operate differently. A plea in abatement attacks the form or procedural posture of the action — it defeats this lawsuit, not the underlying right. A plea in bar attacks the substance and, if successful, defeats the plaintiff's right entirely. Historical sources, particularly Bouvier, spend considerable space distinguishing the two because confusion between them had real procedural consequences: a defendant who raised matter of bar as matter in abatement, or vice versa, could waive important rights. Modern civil procedure has largely absorbed both into the motion practice under rules like Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, but the distinction remains important when reading pre-code cases. ABATEMENT vs. REDUCTION/DISCOUNT. In tax contexts, practitioners sometimes use "abatement," "reduction," "credit," and "refund" interchangeably. They are not synonymous. An abatement cancels an assessed liability before it is collected. A refund returns money already paid. A credit offsets future liability. Conflating these terms when researching IRS procedures or judicial review standards will produce unreliable results. ---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES Plea in Abatement: The formal procedural vehicle in common-law pleading by which a defendant raised grounds for abating an action. Subject to strict rules: had to be raised early, before pleading to the merits, and had to propose a remedy (i.e., show how the plaintiff could cure the defect). Abatement of Nuisance: Either judicial (by injunction or order) or, in narrow circumstances, extrajudicial (self-help abatement by an injured party acting without undue force and without breach of the peace). Abatement of Legacy/Devise: The pro-rata or priority-ordered reduction of testamentary gifts when estate assets are insufficient. Order of abatement (residuary first, then general, then specific/demonstrative) may be modified by the testator's expressed intent. Tax Penalty Abatement: Administrative reduction of penalties or interest assessed by a taxing authority, available on grounds such as reasonable cause, statutory exception, or first-time abatement programs. Distinct from audit reconsideration or formal appeals. Abatement of Rent: A reduction in rent, either by agreement or by operation of law, typically where the leased premises become partially unusable. Related to, but not identical with, the defense of constructive eviction. ---
Why It Matters in Research
The multi-context nature of abatement is the central research hazard. A search for "abatement" across the Law Mind corpus will return results from pleading treatises, probate opinions, nuisance cases, tax rulings, and landlord-tenant disputes — often with no shared doctrinal logic between them. Filtering by context before searching, or reading headnotes carefully, is essential. For historical pleading research: The plea in abatement is a creature of common-law forms of action and largely disappeared with the adoption of code pleading and modern civil procedure rules. Cases decided before the mid-nineteenth century in most American jurisdictions, and before the Judicature Acts in England, use the term in this technical procedural sense. Post-code cases rarely use "abatement" to mean a pleading defense; when they do, they are usually referring to pre-code doctrine in historical context or applying it in the few jurisdictions that retained elements of common-law pleading longer than most. For probate research: The order of abatement is a default rule that wills can modify. When reading older wills or probate decisions, look for express language about priority among gifts; its absence triggers the default abatement rules, which varied somewhat by jurisdiction and period. For tax research: The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia entries on this term address modern IRS abatement procedures (first-time penalty abatement, reasonable cause, interest abatement under I.R.C. § 6404) and judicial review standards. These are wholly distinct from the historical pleading and property meanings. Researchers working on tax matters should anchor to those encyclopedia entries rather than to the historical dictionary sources, which predate the modern administrative tax system. For nuisance research: Abatement as a remedy sits alongside damages and injunction. Courts have not always treated self-help abatement favorably; the conditions under which a private party may abate a nuisance without incurring liability are narrower than the general language of older treatises suggests. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries agree on the core structure of the term but reflect the priorities of their eras. Black's (both editions) leads with the pleading definition, which was the most technically significant meaning in common-law practice and the one most likely to generate litigation over procedure. Bouvier's is the most expansive, devoting substantial space to the plea in abatement — its grounds (misjoinder, fictitious parties, coverture), its timing requirements, and the consequences of defective pleading. Bouvier's treatment is valuable precisely because it reflects the level of procedural granularity that common-law courts actually applied. Burrill's entry is notably spare — offering the Latin source (abatamentum) and cross-referencing rather than developing the doctrine — which is consistent with Burrill's general approach of compressed entries. Rapalje & Lawrence's version is dense with case citations, useful for locating primary sources but less helpful for understanding doctrine without a guiding framework. What the historical dictionaries collectively understate: the probate abatement doctrine and nuisance abatement receive far less systematic treatment than the pleading definition. Tax abatement, as a modern administrative concept, is entirely absent — the corpus on that topic belongs to twentieth and twenty-first century administrative sources, not Victorian legal dictionaries. Researchers should not mistake the silence on these topics in historical dictionaries for legal unimportance; it reflects only the era of compilation. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The order of abatement of legacies in probate follows a default hierarchy (residuary, general, specific/demonstrative) that most American jurisdictions codified in their probate statutes, but the details — and the extent to which testators can override the default — vary by state. In tax matters, federal abatement procedures (IRS penalty abatement, interest abatement under the Internal Revenue Code) operate independently of state tax abatement regimes, which have their own standards and procedures. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Abatement of Penalties Reasonable Cause (The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia) First-Time Penalty Abatement (The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia) Interest Abatement Judicial Review (The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Plea in Bar | Nuisance | Legacy | Devise | Abatement of Nuisance | Forms of Action | Dilatory Plea | Code Pleading | Tax Penalty | Reasonable Cause | Defeasance | Suspension | Reduction | Joinder | Misjoinder | Coverture (historical)
ABATEMENTmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
In pleading. The ef- fect produced upon an action at law, when the defendant pleads matter of fact showing the writ or declaration to be defective and incorrect. This defeats the action for the time being, but the plaintiff may proceed with it after the defect is removed, or may recom- mence it in a better way. In England, in equity pleading, declinatory pleas to the ju- risdiction and dilatory to the persons were (prior to the judicature act) sometimes, by analogy to common law, termed "pleas in abatement." In chancery practice. The determina- tion, cessation, or suspension of all proceed- ings in a suit, from the want of proper par- ties capable of proceeding therein, as upon the death of one of the parties pending the suit. See 2 Tidd, Pr. 932; Story, Eq. Pl. § 354. In mercantile law. A drawback or re- bate allowed in certain cases on the duties due on imported goods, in consideration of their deterioration or damage suffered during importation, or while in store. A diminu- tion or decrease in the amount of tax imposed upon any person. In contracts. A reduction made by the creditor for the prompt payment of a debt due by the payor or debtor. Wesk. Ins. 7. Of legacies and debts. A proportional diminution or reduction of the pecuniary leg- acies, when the funds or assets out of which such legacies are payable are not sufficient to pay them in full. Ward, Leg. p. 369, c. 6, §7; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. § 555; 2 Bl. Comm. 512, 513. In equity, when equitable assets are insufficient to satisfy fully all the creditors, their debts must abate in proportion, and breaking or pulling it down, or otherwise re- moving, disintegrating, or effacing it. The remedy which the law allows a party injured by a nuisance of destroying or re- moving it by his own act, so as he commits no riot in doing it, nor occasions (in the case of a private nuisance) any damage beyond what the removal of the inconvenience nec- C essarily requires. 3 Bl. Comm. 5, 168; 3 D Steph. Comm. 361; 2 Salk. 458.
ABATEMENTmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
19 Johns. 308; 14 Ark. 27; 5 Vt. 98 (ex- cept in ejectment; 19 Johns. 308); and by one of two or more defendants as to one or more of his co-defendants; Archb. C. P. 312. That one of the plaintiffs is a flicti- tious person, to defeat the action as to all; Com. Dig. Abt. E, 16; 1 Chit. Pl. 448; Archb. C. P. 304. This would also be a good plea in bar; 1 B. & P. 44. That the nominal plaintiff in the action of eject- ment is fictitious, is not pleadable in any manner; 4 M. & S. 301; 10 Johns. 269. A defendant cannot plead matter which affects his co-defendant alone; 40 Me. 336; 4 Zabr. 333; 34 N. H. 243; 21 Wend. 457. Certain legal disabilities are pleadable in abatement, such as outlawry; Bac. Abr. Abt. B; Co. Litt. 128 a; attainder of treason or felony; 8 Bla. Com. 301; Com. Dig. Abt. E. 3; also præmunire and ex communication; 3 Bla. Com. 301; Com. Dig. Abt. E. 5. The law in reference to these disabilities can be of no practical im- portance in the United States; Gould, Pl. ch. 5, § 32. Alienage. That the plaintiff is an alien friend is pleadable only in some cases, where, for instance, he sues for property which he is incapacitated from holding or acquiring; Co. Litt. 129 b; Busb. N. С. 250. By the common law, although he could not inherit, yet he might acquire by purchase, and hold as against all but the sovereign. Accordingly he has been allowed in this country to sue upon a title by grant or devise; 1 Mass. 256; 7 Cra. 603; but see 6 Cal. 250; 26 Mo. 426. The early English authority upon this point was otherwise; Bac. Abr. Abt. B, 3, Aliens D; Co. Litt. 129 b. He is in general able to maintain all actions relating to personal chattels or personal injuries; 3 Bla. Com. 384; Cowp. 161; Bac. Abr. Aliens D;2 Kent 34; Co. Litt. 129 b. But an alien enemy can maintain no action except by licence or permission of the government; Bac. Abr. Abt. B, 3, . Aliens D; 46; 1 Ld. Raym. 282; 2 Stra. 1082; 6 Term 53, 49; 6 Binn. 241; 9 Mass. 363, 377; 3 M. & S. 533; 2 Johns. Ch. 508; 1 S. & R. 315. This will be implied from the alien being suffered to remain, or to come to the country, after the commencement of hos- tilities without being ordered away by the If the general legacies are exhausted be-executive; 10 Johns. 69. See 28 Eng. L. & fore the debts are paid, then, and not till then, the specific legacies abate, and pro- portionally; 2 Bla. Com. 518 and note; Bacon, Abr. Leg. H; Kop. Leg. 208, 284 ; 2 Brown, Ch. 19; 2 P. Wms. 383; 1 Ves. Sen. 564; 40 Mo. 280; 63 Pa. 312. In Revenue Law. The deduction from, or the refunding of, duties sometimes made at the custom house, on account of damages received by goods during importation or while in store. See Act of Congress, Mar. 2, 1799, § 52, R. S. § 2894. Of Nuisances. The removal of a nui- sance, 3 Bla. Com. 5; Poll. Torts 210. See
ABATEMENTmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
where coverture avoids the contract or in- strument, it is matter in bar; 14 S. & R. 379. Where a jeme covert is sued without her husband for a cause of action that would survive against her, as upon a contract made before, or a tort committed after, marriage, the coverture is pleadable in abatement; 8 Term 626; and not other- wise; 9 M. & W. 299; Com. Dig. Abt. F, 2. If the marriage takes place pending the action, it cannot be pleaded: 2 Ld. Raym. 1525; 5 Me. 445; 2 M'Cord 469. It must be pleaded by the feme in person; 2 Saund. 209 b. Any thing which suspends the coverture suspends also the right to plead it; Com. Dig. Abt. F, 2, § 3; Co. Litt. 132 b; 1 B. & P. 358, n. (f); 15 Mass. 31; 6 Pick. 29. Marriage of female defendant in error after writ has been duly served, will not abate suit, but it will proceed as if she were still unmarried: 30 Fla. 210. Death of the plaintiff before purchase of the writ may be pleaded in abatement; 1 Archb. C. P. 304; Com. Dig. Abt. E, 17:3 Ill. 507; 1 W. & S. 438; 14 Miss. 205; 2 M'- Mull. 49. So may the death of a sole plaintiff who dies pending his suit at common law; Bac. Abr. Abt. F: 4 Hen. & M. 410; 3 Mass. 296; 2 Root 57: 9 Mass. 422; 2 Rand. Va. 454; 2 Me. 127. Otherwise now by statute, in most cases, in most if not all the states of the United States, and in Eng- land since 1852. The personal representa- tives are usually authorized to act in such cases. If the cause of action is such that the right dies with the person, the suit still abates. By statute 8 & 9 Wım. IV. ch. 2, sect. 7., which is understood to enact the common-law rule, where the form of action is such that the death of one of several plaintiffs will not change the plea, the action does not abate by the death of any of the plaintiffs pending the suit. The death of the lessor in ejectment never abates the suit; 8 Johns. 495; 23 Ala. N. S. 193; 13 Ired. 43, 489; 1 Blatchf. 393. On death of plaintiff in ejectment his heirs are properly substi- tuted on defendant's petition 158 Pa. 497. On death of administrator bringing suit it may be revived by his administrator or by administrator de bonis non; 92 Tenn. 514. In Missouri an action for personal in- juries cannot be revived by the admin istrator after plaintiff's death; 97 Mo. 79. in Maryland an action by husband to recover damages for the killing of his wife, abates on his death: 70 Md. 319. On the death of one of three partners plaintiff the remaining two may prosecute to final judgment in their own names; 93 Ala. 173. The death of sole defendant pending an action abates it; Bac. Abr. Abt. F; Hayw. 500; 2 Binn. 1; Gilm. 145; 4 M'Cord 160; 7 Wheat. 530; 1 Watts 229; 4 Mass. 480;8 Me. 129; 11 Ga. 151. But where one of several co-defendants dies pending the action, his death is in general no cause of abatement, even by common law: Cro. Car. 426; Bac. Abr. Abt. F; Gould, Pl. ch. 5, § 93. If cause of action is such as would survive against the survivor or survivors, the plaintiff may proceed by suggesting the death upon the record; 24 Miss. 192; Gould, Pl. ch. 5, § 93. Where one of several plaintiffs or defendants in error dies, the suit does not abate or require a revival in the Supreme Court; 96 Mo. 316. The inconvenience of abatement by death of parties was remedied by 17 Car. II. ch. 8, and 8 & 9 Wm. III. ch. 2, ss. 6, 7. In the United States, on the death of a sole defendant, his personal representatives may be substituted if the action could have been originally prosecuted against them; Gould, Pl. ch. 5, § 95. The right of action against a tort-feaser dies with him; and such death should be pleaded in abate- ment; 3 Cal. 370. Many exceptions to this rule exists by statute. Infancy is pleadable in abatement to the person of the plaintiff, unless the in- fant appear by guardian or prochein ami; Co. Litt. 135 6; 2 Saund. 117; 3 Bla. Com. 301; Bac. Abr. Infancy, K. 2; 7 Johns. 379; 2 Conn. 357; 3 E. D. Sm. 296; 8 Pick. 552. He cannot appear by attorney, since he cannot make a power of attorney; 8 Saund. 212; 8 N. H. 345; 8 Pick. 552; 4 Halst. 381; 2 N.. H. 487; 7 Johns. 373. The death of the next friend bringing suit for minors does not abate suit, nor does the attainment of majority by minors; 68 Miss. 693. Where an infant sues as co-executor with an adult, both may appear by attorney, for, the suit being brought in autre droit, the personal rights of the in- fant are not affected. and therefore the adult is permitted to appoint an attorney for both; 8 Saund. 212; 1 Rolle, Abr. 288; Cro. Eliz. 542. At common law, judgment obtained for or against an infant plaintiff who appears by attorney, no plea being interposed, may be reversed by writ of error: 1 Rolle, Abr. 287; Cro. Jac. By statute, however, such judg- ment is valid, if for the infant; 8 Saund. 212 (n. 5). 441. Imprisonment. A sentence to imprison- ment in New York, either of plaintiff or de- fendant, abates the action by statute; 2 Johns. Cas. 408; 1 Duer 664; but see 8 Bosw. 617. Iunacy. A lunati
ABATEMENTn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
The act of abating, or the state of being abated; a lessening, diminution, or reduction; removal or putting an end to; as, the abatement of a nuisance is the suppression thereof. The amount abated; that which is taken away by way of reduction; deduction; decrease; a rebate or discount allowed. A mark of dishonor on an escutcheon. The entry of a stranger, without right, into a freehold after the death of the last possessor, before the heir or devisee. Blackstone. Defense in abatement, Plea in abatement, (Law), plea to the effect that from some formal defect (e.g. misnomer, want of jurisdiction) the proceedings should be abated.
abatementnoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
The act of abating, or the state of being abated; a lessening, diminution, or reduction; a moderation; removal or putting an end to; the suppression. | The deduction of minor revenues incidental to an operation in calculating the cost of the operation. | The action of a person that abates, or without proper authority enters a residence after the death of the owner and before the heir takes possession. | The reduction of the proceeds of a will, when the debts have not yet been satisfied; the reduction of taxes due. | An amount abated; that which is taken away by way of reduction; deduction; decrease; a rebate or discount allowed; in particular from a tax. | A mark of dishonor on an escutcheon; any figure added to the coat of arms tending to lower the dignity or station of the bearer. | Waste of stuff in preparing to size. | A beating down, a putting down. | A quashing, a judicial defeat, the rendering abortive by law. | Forcible entry of a stranger into an inheritance when the person seised of it dies, and before the heir or devisee can take possession; ouster. | rebatement, real or imaginary marks of disgrace affixed to an escutcheon.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In