A SETTLEMENT

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

A SETTLEMENTAuthored
The Law Mind • 1414 words
Definition
A settlement is a voluntary resolution of a dispute, claim, or legal proceeding reached by agreement between the parties, without (or before) a final adjudication on the merits. The term carries distinct meanings depending on context: 1. LITIGATION SETTLEMENT. An agreement by which parties to a pending or threatened lawsuit resolve their dispute on negotiated terms, typically in exchange for payment of money, dismissal of claims, or other consideration. A settlement ends — or prevents — the litigation. It may be memorialized in a written settlement agreement, incorporated into a court order, or entered as a consent judgment. 2. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. The written contract that embodies the terms of the resolution. Settlement agreements commonly include a release of claims, confidentiality provisions, representations by the settling parties, and conditions on payment or performance. In employment contexts, a settlement agreement may also be called a severance agreement, particularly when it accompanies separation from employment. 3. ESTATE AND PROPERTY SETTLEMENT. In older usage, a "settlement" refers to the legal arrangement by which property is settled upon a person or family — most commonly through a marriage settlement or family settlement — creating a fixed disposition of an estate. This meaning is largely obsolete in American practice but appears frequently in historical sources and English legal materials. 4. ACCOUNT SETTLEMENT. In commercial contexts, settlement refers to the discharge or resolution of a financial obligation, account, or debt, often by agreement between creditor and debtor on terms different from the original obligation. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "settlement" means the act of settling a matter; an arrangement concluding a dispute; also, payment of a debt or obligation; also, a community newly established in a place. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "settlement" is defined broadly to include the act of settling; establishment in a fixed residence; the adjustment of differences; the liquidation of an account; the act of peopling or colonizing a new region; and specifically, in law, the conveyance of property to create a fixed disposition for the benefit of a family. The principal gap between ordinary and legal usage is one of precision and consequence. In common speech, "settling" a matter is informal and can mean little more than reaching an agreement. In legal practice, a settlement is a binding contract with enforceable terms — including, critically, a release of claims that may permanently extinguish rights the settling party did not fully appreciate. The casual connotation of informality is misleading; a settlement in litigation is typically as final and binding as a judgment. ---
Common Confusion
A settlement is frequently confused with a consent decree or consent judgment. A settlement agreement is a private contract between the parties; it binds the parties contractually but is not itself a court order. A consent judgment or consent decree is entered by the court and carries the enforcement mechanisms of a judicial order. Parties sometimes specifically request that a settlement be incorporated into a court order to obtain that enforcement power. The distinction matters: a breach of a private settlement agreement requires a new contract action, while a breach of a consent decree may be enforced through contempt proceedings. Settlement is also sometimes loosely used interchangeably with "compromise." While closely related, a compromise more specifically denotes the mutual concession of competing claims, whereas a settlement encompasses the full agreement resolving the dispute, including terms beyond the mere compromise of the underlying claim. ---
Why It Matters in Research
The term "settlement" is one of the most searched and most context-dependent in the law. Researchers face several navigational challenges: JURISDICTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL VARIATIONS. The enforceability, confidentiality, and procedure for entering settlements vary by jurisdiction and by type of proceeding. Federal court settlements in cases involving public interest claims (civil rights, environmental, antitrust) may require court approval. Class action settlements require judicial approval under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e). Family law settlements — particularly those affecting child custody or support — require court approval in virtually all jurisdictions regardless of party agreement. Researchers must identify the procedural posture before assuming a private contract analysis applies. RELEASES AND THEIR SCOPE. The most consequential element of a litigation settlement is usually the release of claims. Historical and modern sources may treat the release as a separate legal instrument; in practice, the release is typically embedded in the settlement agreement itself. Researchers analyzing whether a prior settlement bars a current claim must examine the release language closely — broad general releases ("all claims, known and unknown") operate very differently from claim-specific releases. Some jurisdictions require explicit waiver language to release unknown claims. EMPLOYMENT SETTLEMENT RESEARCH. Employment settlements and severance agreements are subject to additional statutory requirements not applicable to ordinary contract settlements. The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) imposes specific disclosure and waiting-period requirements for valid releases of federal age discrimination claims. Researchers in this area must treat employment settlements as a specialized subcategory with its own compliance framework. CONFIDENTIALITY. Settlement agreements frequently contain confidentiality provisions, which means the substantive terms of most settlements do not appear in publicly available court records. Researchers using case law to assess settlement values or standard terms will find the public record systematically incomplete. RULE 68 OFFERS OF JUDGMENT. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 and its state counterparts create a distinct settlement mechanism — the offer of judgment — with specific cost-shifting consequences if the offeree ultimately recovers less than the offer. This is not a settlement in the ordinary sense but occupies related doctrinal territory and appears in settlement research. HISTORICAL MEANING TRAP. Researchers working in pre-twentieth-century materials, English sources, or equity materials will encounter "settlement" predominantly in the property/estate sense — the conveyance of a fixed interest in property, especially a marriage settlement. Conflating this meaning with the modern litigation-resolution meaning will produce significant misreading of historical texts. The two meanings coexisted for a long period; context is essential. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence does not provide a substantive entry for "a settlement" in the surviving excerpt provided. The Rapalje & Lawrence dictionary is a comprehensive American law dictionary of the late nineteenth century, and its treatment of settlement-adjacent terms would have emphasized both the property/conveyancing sense (settlements of estates, marriage settlements) and the commercial sense (settlement of accounts). The absence of a discrete entry here likely reflects either the alphabetical position of the excerpt provided or the dictionary's treatment of settlement as a term subdivided under related headings. The historical dictionaries generally — Bouvier, Black's early editions, and their contemporaries — treated "settlement" with the property sense as primary, giving the conveyance of real property to specified beneficiaries prominent treatment. The litigation-settlement meaning, while recognized, was secondary in the hierarchy of definitions in nineteenth-century American legal dictionaries. This allocation reflects actual legal practice of the era: the formal settlement of estates through trust instruments was a central feature of property law, while litigation settlements were common but less doctrinally formalized. Modern legal dictionaries have inverted this emphasis almost entirely, treating the litigation-resolution meaning as primary and the property-conveyance meaning as historical. Researchers relying on early editions of Black's or Bouvier for guidance on modern settlement agreements should be aware of this inversion. ---
Jurisdictional Note
Several categories of settlement require court approval regardless of party agreement, including class action settlements, settlements on behalf of minors or incapacitated persons, and settlements affecting child support or custody. Employment settlements releasing federal age discrimination claims must comply with OWBPA requirements to be enforceable. Confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements have come under increased legislative scrutiny in several states, particularly in cases involving sexual harassment claims, and may be unenforceable or restricted in those jurisdictions. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Contracts § 216 — Settlement Agreements and Releases (The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia) Civil Procedure § 78 — Settlement Negotiations, Offers of Judgment, and Rule 68 (The Law Mind Civil Procedure & Evidence Encyclopedia) Employment § 123 — Severance Agreements, Releases, and Settlement of Claims (The Law Mind Employment & Labor Law Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Release of claims Consent decree / consent judgment Compromise Offer of judgment (Rule 68) Dismissal with prejudice Marriage settlement (historical) Family settlement (historical) Severance agreement Confidentiality agreement / non-disclosure agreement Accord and satisfaction Class action settlement Mediated settlement agreement
A SETTLEMENTmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883
Cowell. WILD ANIMALS (or animals feræ naturæ).-Animals of an untamable disposition. See ANIMAL, & 2. WILD LAND, (right of lessee to cut timber on). 7 Johns. (N. Y.) 227. WILD LANDS, (when widow is dowable of). 7 Pick. (Mass.) 143. (when widow not dowable of), 15 Mass. 164; 1 Pick. (Mass.) 21. WILD'S CASE, RULE IN.-A. devise to B. and his children or issue, B. having no issue at the time of the devise, gives him an estate tail; but if he have issue at the time, B. and his children take joint estates for life. 6 Co. 16b; Tud. Cas. R. P. (2 edit.) 542, 581. This case does not apply to personalty. See Andsley 2. Horn, 7 W. R. 125, affirmed on App. 8 W. R. 150; 2 Jarm. Wills (3 edit.) 365, 388.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In